Clearaudio Azimuth Optimizer V Fozgometer


I have been through a few threads regarding the Fozgometer for Azimuth adjustment .Has anyone used the Clearaudio Azimuth Optimizer which cost quite a bit more then the Fozgometer and if so how did it go!!
Stump
128x1281stump
Dicockrum,

Did you try finer adjustments, after using the Fozgometer, or just believe the meter and go with that setting?

My arm [the original VPI JMW-10] has an azimuth ring with index marks and allows very, very fine adjustments.

The later VPI arms with dropped counter weight are too hard to adjust even with the SoundSmith Counter Intuitive IMO.

Rotating and locking a head shell is too crude for me, and most arms have no azimuth adjustment at all.

If you are satisfied thats fine, but YMMV applies here.

Other people have fine tuned, after using the Fozogometer, for even better results.
Don_c55,

I have only had the Fozgometer for one week so I have not yet had the chance to experiment with other settings based on listening. What I can say at this point is that the reproduction quality I am hearing after adjustment with the Fozgometer is noticeably better than I was able to obtain before.

Interestingly, I own a 1st Gen VPI JMW 12 arm with the marked azimuth ring. I recently reinstalled my Eminent Technology ET Two air bearing arm on my TNT and am enjoying it immensely. It is, however, more difficult to consistently set azimuth on the ET Two than with the JMW 12, so I find the Fozgometer to be a real benefit here.

I will probably try some very small adjustments to the Fozgometer-determined azimuth setting to see if improvement is possible. Even if this proves to be so, I consider the Fozgometer indespensible in baselining the azimuth setting when changing cartridges or making other adjustments on the ET Two.

I wish someone would invent a similar easy-to-use and repeatable device for baselining VTA!

Happy New Year!

Dave
Don, You seem to assume that "correct" azimuth is always equal to the condition where the top surface of the cartridge body is parallel to the LP surface. Not so. Your bubble level will only be "right" for some cartridges; most are not perfectly constructed so that all the innards are oriented as you'd expect.

By the way, the bubble level must add a hell of a lot of effective mass to the tonearm. What does it weigh?
Lew ..., my experiences are the same as Don's. I own a VPI Classic 2.5 (that is a Classic 1/2 plinth and Classic 3 tone arm), plus the S-S Intuit for fine adjustments. I set azimuth with the VPI skinny aluminum bar and use a metric rule to measure azimuth. Crude ... but it seems to get me in the ballpark.

Do you think I could do better with the Fozgometer? I don't even know what the thing is or what it does. I'll check it out on the web.

Frankly, I hate screwing around with the arm after I set the cartridge up. So called fine adjustments made by ear are just a PITA. What do you suggest Lew??

Have a great New Year!!

BIF
Lewm

I do not assume the optimal is with the cartridge parallel to the recored, that is just a starting point.

The bubble level that i use is very small (about 1/3 inch in diameter) and weighs next to nothing.

I aim for the diamond to be perpendicular to the record.

This assumes the cartridge is properly made, which I believe my ZYX Airy 3's are.

I believe small adjustments by ear, after the initial setting (whatever method you use), are an assurance that azimuth is spot on even if the cartridge construction is slightly off.

I may try the Fuzgometer after all, as it is not too much money.

Happy New Year,
Don C.