Comparison of sonic qualities of some tonearms


I’m relatively new to the world of vinyl, listening seriously for probably only 2 years.  Of course, many big picture items (e.g. turntable, phono stage, cartridges) are discussed extensively on this forum, but I haven’t seen much discussion comparing different tonearms.  I would be interested to hear about different people’s experiences with different tonearms, mentioning the audible advantages and disadvantages of each tonearm, realizing that there is no perfect sound, although from what I read about others’ experiences, SAT tonearms may come closest, albeit at a very high price.  

drbond

Showing 7 responses by dogberry

@pindac Your comments not only accord with my experience of the SME V and IV, but they also fit the official story: the Series V came out first, and had selected parts. The Series IV came out later, and had off the line parts that might not quite match the quality of the V's selected parts. If you are lucky, you might buy a IV that sounds better than a V, but even for average arms of each type the sonic differences will be small. The big advantage of the V is ease of adjustment: a screw adjustment for VTA, and a thumbwheel for VTF. Some would say the damping trough is not an advantage for the V. I own a couple of Rega arms along with a collection of SME arms. I don't think the Regas sound worse, but they are more of a nuisance to set up for VTA and overhang. Having easy adjustments encourages me to get it right, rather than saying 'oh, that's good enough'!

It is highly unusual for anyone to have two of exactly the same turntables

I never claimed to be ordinary! 😉

Correct me if I'm wrong, but do we not agree that tonearms do affect sound quality, and the point of this thread is how best to assess that? After all, if they do not, then it shall make no difference which one we buy or use.

As for how to check for differences, it seems the best chance would come from two tables of the same make and model, with the same cartridges of similar hours usage, feeding into the same electronics and speakers. The only difference would be the tonearm on each table. Listening performed blinded during the playing of the same LP on each table. Results in terms of preference would be valid for that cartridge only. That would be the science-based approach, and it is unlikely anyone would bother to do it.

The unscientific approach is one that, I think, still has some validity: a long term comparison and you see how much you are tempted to play music, and how long a session lasts. Lots of times I have liked a component, only to find myself choosing to do other things rather than listen to music. This is using the entire neurological path from eardrum to cortex as a meter that measures desire to listen to music. And that result, if it is to be trusted at all, can only be trusted by the owner of the brain concerned!

The difficult part is to get both records to start playing exactly in sync for stereo.....

The really funny part is that I once did exactly that to compare two cartridges mounted on the same arm on the same tables.

I have not opened the links, why would I,

and

The Links are more than adequate to experience the Sat TA.

...appear to be at odds. Can you help me with that?