Component or HDMI for DVD player?

It may depend on your display. HDMI should be superior with a digital fixed-pixel display but component may be superior with a raster display.

Kal

I'm viewing with a Sharp Aquos LCD. The input reads the same resolution with HDMI as it does component. The HDMI might win when using an up-scan player. All of this might very well depend on the DVD player and what kind of display is being used.

if you dvd player isn't an upsampling type try sending it 480i instead of 480P and let your TV make the conversion.
DVI is definitely superior on my Optoma Projector (HD76 720DLP) with my upscaling Momitus DVD player at 720p over DVI! Amazing quality!

It depends on your display. I use DVI on my Pioneer Elite Pro 630 with Denon 3910 player and the picture is a lot better than component.

HDMI connections dont offer more resolution. They do allow digital video and audio to travel the same line-all digital audio BUT SACD!(in theory) Some interfaces-depending on the equiptment will only pass the video portion. The real advantage of the connection is that it avoids d/a and a/d conversions in the video and audio relms.
Some players offer what they call "upconversion". There are only 480 lines of "visible resolution" on any dvd produced yet. So, "upconverting" 480 lines to 720 or even worse 1080 is adding a whole lot of computer made up information(garbage) that probably will make the picture worse than a really good 480p chip set will make.
Dont get caught by the more is better and newer is better and digital is better with video signals. Most of the same rules apply to video as audio (I will not even mention the old vinal v/s cd war, we all know the winner of that one)Unless we are talking hidef...Which dvd IS NOT there YET!!!
So, I say try them both, look with your eyes and pick the one that looks the most natural-cable and resolution...