2. amps-preamps
  3. 1033320668

Copland CTA301 mkII vs. Copland CTA 305 anyone?

Wanted to know what the sonic difference was between these 2 preamps. I own the cta 301 mkII and consider it a 'giant killer'. Detailed, transparent, smooth, huge soundstage, etc..... it just offers incedible bang for the buck. Is the new Copland cta 305 better, worse?
Thanks guys
dudeaudio
dudeaudio
jwmazur
191 posts
 
I had the CSA(?)303 and it is a great pre. I do now have a 305 after having a Hovland HP 100 and find that it is keeping in the pedigree. The only thing is the trade-off of having remote control but not having a balance control. With my 303 I could get the vocals more focused. I would have to say keep your 301 unless you can get a smokin deal on a 305 and you really want the remote control.
bluenose
387 posts
 
Hi, Jwmazur. You had a Hovland before the 305? How did you find they compared? Thanks
audiomax
166 posts
 
Keep the Copland CTA301 MKII (with or without remote).
jwmazur
191 posts
 
The Hovland had great speed. I have never had piano sound so great. It would also communicate the tension and release of the music. It just didn't have the holographic soundscape that the Copland had. I had the performers more in the room with me on the Copland. This company just does not get enough US exposure and that's all to the detriment of fellow 'philes.
More to discover