Cost Incurred to Achieve a Vinyl LP Replay

In relation to my statement,

"most I have encountered over many years have been constrained in their budgets for the Ancillaries required to replay a Vinyl LP.

By the above, I am referring to individuals deliberately taking the stance of expressing a Disciplined and Controlled position when parting with monies to create their Vinyl Source. It has very little, if anything, to do with ones disposable income.

I feel very confident that there are Forum Active Audio enthusiasts, who have an Audio System, with Vinyl only as a Source, who are using equipment that is costing much less than can be afforded.   

@lewm has picked up on this and clearly describes that his enthusiasm for recoded music has lead him to being the Keeper of 3000ish LP's, to provide an extensive range of entertainment. When it comes to the methods put in pace to experience recorded music, it has been clearly described that this is coming from a constrained approach. 

@lewn shares similarities to individuals I regularly communicate with, as well as myself, where the use of gathered knowledge and skills (Hobby), are thought through to be utilised with an intent to transform owned items to a level of performance that can be recognised as an improvement.            

"The question that is a vaguery, is how much monies, from a range of approx', £3K ($3.2K) - (£350K ($400K) does one feel justified in spending/believes needs to be spent, to satisfy their hobby (lessons learned) needs and need to be entertained (enjoyment of listening to music)."

Reflecting on my own experiences, individuals who are invested into a Vinyl Replay Set Up, Inclusive of TT, Tonearm, Cartridge, Phonostage and Cables. For a large percentage, the individuals have been quite proactive in their endeavours to discover the present in use ancillaries. The discoveries made are ones that have been sought out through the individuals desire to create change.

Ancillaries are discovered, tried, and usually become a inclusive or rejected ancillary within a system. It is this attitude expressed from an individual to create what could be referred to as progressive change, that can eventually expose the individual to a level of sonic produced from a Vinyl Replay that is to be classed as as quite desirable and worthwhile as being maintained over other experiences encountered. In general, the individuals searching and desire to be creative is near its end, once the 'quite desirable' is discovered.      

From my own perspective, I have adopted methods for a Vinyl Sources Mechanical and Electronic Interfaces that are designs that have become a trend being used on modern designs for TT's, Tonearms and Phonostages. As a result, the discovery is what I class as being ancillaries in use, that are proving to be totally satisfactory and wanted to be maintained.

The ancillaries in use, are as a combined value, coming in at the lower end of the range of expenditure outlined, with costs fitting comfortably into the £6 - £16K area. As important, is that experiences had, have left me with the impression I do not need to expand beyond this as an expenditure to experience a Vinyl Replay, I certainly am not being influenced by the idea that much more expensive ancillaries are going to create an experience that is seemingly more desirable. 

Hence, my invite is to individuals to share their experiences and how they have come to terminate or believe they could continue their journey to discover their own unique Vinyl Replay Set Up.  

       

@crustycoot The wonderful thing for a user of Vinyl LP as a medium and Source for accessing recorded data, is that the collection of LP's has a Value. In some cases in today's market, due to enthusiasts for owning Vinyl for more than replay purposes only, there are owned LP's that can be discovered to be substantially appreciated in value above a purchase price.

Off Topic

A friend become interested in Classical Music, and educated themselves to become quite familiar with early Classical Recordings (Brands Pressings) that are sought after across the Globe. The friend started to buy up 'Job Lots' of Classical Vinyl and after having used their acquired knowledge of the market, extracted a few choice LP's to be resold on from the 'Job Lots'. This as a method has enabled a substantial Classical Musical collection on Vinyl for very little monies, as well as remaining being a collection worth reasonable monies.  

@whart, Thank You for contributing, the Thread is not produced to be about what 'one believes is the best', (way too confrontational) it is a 'good will' Theme for the Holiday Period and very much produced for the individual to express themselves about their experiences had or in planning to have.

The Thread is absolutely aligned to your comments offered, which is where you have stated, that you have arrived at a place that enables you to feel your experiences had, have enabled you to feel Vinyl being replayed at at present is  satisfying, and I hope your most satisfying to date. Maybe you feel further experiences are necessary to get to the Journey's End or is the present set up the end game?

@jpan, I am referring to the Source in a larger than usually used reference, this is due to my experiences had and discussions had with others. It is also possible to see from some of the earlier posts the overall Vinyl Replay Set Up is the consideration.

It is the the permutation of selections made, that are seemingly the X Factor for the individual, hence, nobody seems to have the identical set up. From Styli through to the Phonostage > Pre Amp umbilical, it is the overall assembly that matters for the individual. 

Through my own endeavours for making changes, I have been able to create the perception of a Sonic that has been assessed for being an attractive improvement or alternatively an unwanted addition. This has been achieved by something as simple as a Cartridge Tag Wire exchange or a Rectifier.

When addressing the overall interface, as a result of singular ancillary exchanges, the outcome for myself, has been the sum of the parts used is quite important. the The selection made for the configurations/permutations of ancillaries, are the critical choices that are able to deliver a Sonic that punches way above any expectations and are the most attractive to be in use. I have made my budget allocation known for my Vinyl Set Up and feel there is no need to reach beyond this outlay to experience something different.

I know through communications with others my own experiences have been discovered by individuals seeking out their own unique preferences for a produced sonic.

Hence my statement " Individuals who are invested into a Vinyl Replay Set Up, Inclusive of TT, Tonearm, Cartridge, Phonostage and Cables."

The Thread is about encouraging an individual to make it known where their cut off point has been or their Journey, or if the Journey is forecast to continue. The cost incurred to reach Journeys End or projected as the ballpark figure to get in reach a Journey's End.

My take on it, and one other reason for producing this Thread, is that in one interpretation of being a conventional 'Audiophile', is that the objective is to be creative and have enthusiasm for producing sonic that is of the absolute highest fidelity. Combined with marketing pressure for ancillaries woven into the fabric of this, encourages the notion that substantial expenditure is required to achieve this position of the highest levels of fidelity.

My experience with 'dyed in the wool' enthusiasts for the use of the Vinyl LP as a source, is that most individuals who have shared their own experiences are seen to be standing strong in their found place. The marketing aspect has diminished to the point it has very little through to zero influence on choices being made.

Individuals communicated with are contented with their discoveries, as well as in their expressing a constrained attitude toward how they spend on equipment to supply a form of entertainment.

@tomic601 I like yourself have been inquisitive to learn about the ambient environments influence on the quality of the sonic produced when Vinyl os being replayed.

Additionally, expressing an interest in being investigative about Mechanical and Electrical Interfaces and how these being present are able to impact on the sonic produced, I have stated this interest as being a (Hobby). It certainly extends beyond the attraction of listening to a recorded replay as a form of entertainment. 

What is the outcome, there are certainly methods adopted that have been discovered as being a widespread in use method to create an improved interface.

Extended investigations will show that methods adopted and being used across a wide range of enthusiasts, are also being utilised by Manufacturers of TT's > Tonearms > Phonostages, where Items offered can be found utilising the mathods come with substantial retail prices.

With such discoveries made, there is the underlying question, how far separated is my set up that has adopted these methods, from these expensive Branded Commercial offerings, using a similar approach for the design concept? 

As I don't compare to such items as a very expensive TT, I do not know the answer to that one?

A Certain Brand of TT that retails for approx' £20K I do know well, and can comfortably say, the expensive TT has not been standout during comparisons which are attended by a Group. The Group assessment has also strongly suggested the most expensive TT in use has not proved to be the most attractive either. 

I am a advocate of Social Activities within my HiFi experiences, and part of these experiences regularly create opportunities to encounter and compare ancillaries.

I have and will continue to compare ancillaries such as Tonearms and Phonostages and in my case Cart's as well as a evaluation undertaken by a Group of experienced users of HiFi Systems. My experiences to date, and one that has been found to be agreed on by others, is that my choices for ancillaries in use, are surpassing Branded Items encountered in relation to the attraction I seek from the usage of a ancillary.

My usage of unmodified Branded Items in my system is now limited to a CDT only.

@tomic601, In relation to your options to replay a Vinyl LP, I see that your selections made, offer many options on permutations to fulfill your unique preferences for a produced sonic.

In recent years, I have kept my experiences to change a sonic, limited to Headshell Exchange, Cart' Exchanges and using alternative Phonostages > SUT > Head Amp. It is this immediate access to making changes and ultimately a change to the sonic, that makes the use of Vinyl my main attraction over the other Source Option in the System. Your own methods to achieve a change to a sonic, are looking to be a speedier option that my own method adopted.

It is without doubt that you are experienced on discoveries of how a Modern approach and Vintage approach to a TT's design can be separated in relation to mechanical and electrical interfaces.

The (Hobby) element of your interest also stands out in the forefront. Looking at the materials selected and designs/usage of the materials put in place, what would be classed as a Vintage approach, has been met with a designated use of materials and design that takes the vintage design into a Modern/Vintage Hybrid as a conception.

I myself have found the Modern/Vintage concept to be a very satisfying experience. The knowing something quite improved is an outcome has been a stimulus to keep on with the inquisitiveness and investigative personality. Others (some very experienced) who have taken my prompts and set themselves up to accurately compare Original vs Modified can't say enough in favour of the modified version.   

       

   

 

@hilde45 I have access to a similar Tool for editing.

It is ideal for a day to day tidy of something being put together in the workplace.

I am not in the workplace when discussing and sharing on a forum, hence I will write exactly as I please.

You know who I am, you can always stand down and keep stum, but I sense that will be way too much of a challenge for you. 

The editing Tool is way way, it looks like the software needs more work.

The editing tool suggests the wring intention for the nature of the Thread in some of the description it has presented. The tools content presents in a way that suggests only certain types of individual are invited to share their experiences, where as this thread encourages all to share their experiences. 

Maybe the individual responsible for the input of the information to be edited, manipulated the input for the editing tool until their own preferred edit appeared for posting??   

The intention in my method of writing is to be prolix, it is deliberate.

Across different forums, Communications have evolved through PM contact after a contribution from myself has had time to be aired. It is a reader looking to learn if their interpretation is on track, that I use as an indicator something of value has been identified and revisited by an interested party at a time that is more suitable.

As stated on other occasions, my writing is for the passive members, visitors and active forum members. I would think that active members are not with much need of my experiences, aims and goals, even though some active members do share similar activities and methods as I have adopted      

A reader from the above mentioned list, who is willing to parse the presented content that is proving to be of interest, will hopefully be able to store the content and improve the chance that info is available, offering a long term value. Acquiring ideas and having supporting guidance makes the exploring of options, a more sure footed experience.

In relation to the fundamental of this thread, there are plenty of forum Passive Members and Visitors keen to learn. There is already sensible contributions that have given a guidance.

I found the Software Edit to way off track in the context of the last sentence used, it was suggesting a exclusivity was being called upon. As stated in posts, the intention is to encourage as many to share as possible, without limitation, the budget used is a guideline only. The 'Cost' is a addition to help an individual see a scale of what is being spent by an individual to create a extremely satisfying experience unique to their preference with the Vinyl LP used as a Source.    

@mijostyn Your Post has steered the thread back into the intended direction.

Your description given has almost mirrored my own limited experiences, where an individual known to have a long term enthusiasm for Audio Equipment, and a very keen interest in using Vinyl LP as the source, has discovered that an outlay of around £30K, has been found to supply the sonic that suits their own personal preferences.

My own referencing in the OP, much more expensive equipment used to replay the Vinyl LP, points out the demo's received were in unfamiliar surroundings through unfamiliar systems. Even though a Google search might show images of particular events attended and assist with reminding me of a Design and Aesthetic seen during a demo. The memories recollected strongly suggests nothing notable occurred on the day. 

  

@dogberry I have shared with you in the past on occasions about your methods used for mounting Tonearms.

Additionally, I don't remember your Brand of preferred TT being discussed, but I am very familiar with SME as a Brand. I have heard the 3009 Tonearms in use for most of my time around Audio Equipment, a friend loves to get under the hood and extract every last morsel that a 3009 can offer, I have heard these in use on numerous occasions.

The SME IV and V model TA's have been extensively demo'd and as a result I  have owned the IV Model for numerous years. It took a very long time until I discovered a TA design that superseded the IV and other owned TA's.

I have been demo'd the TOTR SME TT's on regular occasions in my days of visiting Commercial Events, it was at this time I chose to adopt a different drive TT.

Over the years I have encountered these TT's in use and not too long ago I was regularly receiving demo's of the SME 20/12 model in a system I was familiar with. 

As for your own investment of approx' CDN- $54K, this is another outlay from a 'dye in the wool' Vinyl LP  enthusiast, that is very close to the figures I have put forward.

Using my own experiences, which are made known and now using the contributions from forum members offered to this thread, there is a furthering  of reinforcement to my own notion, that suggests there are constrained attitudes expressed by individuals for their purchases. It is interesting how there is a description of offer that mirrors my own, which is not wanting to aspire to something quite different than what is already created.  

When seeing the selections made by 'dye in the wool' enthusiasts for Vinyl Replay Source Items, even though choices being made are not typical across the individuals in their Brand Selection. The accumulating monies outlaid are seen to be similar in requirement, to acquire the ancillaries that offer the individual a experience of replayed music that is meeting their unique preference. 

 

 

I have been allocated my own personal listening space within the home, which indirectly meant 'in my mind',  there was no holds barred on the aesthetic front. I have thoroughly abused this new liberty, not much amuses me when it comes to being creative with an assembly. 

My mounted on Granite Sub Plinths under the HiFi Racks are sheets of Steel with a dimension of 900mm (36") x 1100mm (44") x 12mm (1/2"). 

The raised above the floor by approx' 500mm (20") Sub Plinth for the Monoblocks is a Granite Slab weighing in at approx' 250Kg. Positioning that proved to be fun, but it is doable with the right plan in place. 

As with all changes made to a mechanical interface on a TT, TA or Cart' a change will be detected for the perceived sonic, it is almost certain to occur.

Living with the new set up and perceived sonic, will over time produce indicators where the change made is being perceived as valuable or whether something seems to be amiss.

If the amiss indicator shows regularly, reverting back to a earlier set up, should be enough to allow for showing where the change is for the better or worse.

It is not uncommon for a sonic that is unfamiliar and causing questions to stir, actually proves at the time of a revert, that the latest produced sonic is the most attractive option to be maintained.

Looking at your Image, I can see opportunity for a substantial tidying up of the sonic, if the table is isolated from the TT and Pods by mounting these onto a Sub Plinth / Sub Sub Plinth, using different configurations of materials for the separators.

 

 

A friend, who a few Years ago was to become very impressed with my own rebuilt SP10 MkII and redesigned/modified Tonearm. The MkII and Modified TA, was demo’d to my local HiFi Group on a day set aside for comparisons of the MkII >TA, to a few of the Group Members owned TT’s. One being an expensively upgraded Linn LP12 and another members SME 20/12.

The outcome of that session being (No BS either),

The Linn owner shortly after become a owner of the SP10R > Glanz MH-1200S (mounted on a own design professionally produced Pod) > Miyajima.

The SME 20/12 owner was convinced their Source had been bettered and shortly after hearing their Source compared to the SP10 R, had this notion of being bettered reinforced, resulting in their selling the SME 20/12 and with the funds, has been happily experiencing a range of different TT’s across the past few years, which I have had the pleasure of being demo’d them in use.

An attendee at the first experience of my SP10 MkII compared to the Linn and SME, as a result the impression made, bought a SP10 MkII took it to my Technician and had SP10 MkII and Identical Tonearm to my own produced. Shortly after their comparing the New SP10 MkII > New TA to their owned Mitchell Orbe ( fully modified ) > Audio Note TA > Audio Note IO, the Orbe and AN TA were both sold on.

Here goes, tying things together.

The owner of the SP10 R resides in a Historical Property lots of exposed beams and natural movement within the structure due to the structures method of build.

Furniture for the property has been selected that has a Period aesthetic, of which many are antiques. One furniture item is seen as a large Antique Oak Table produced using substantial pieces of Timber.

The Oak Table serves the role as the HiFi Rack, it supports the TT > Phonostage > Pre Amp and Power Amp.

I had heard the Linn TT set up on this table on a few occasions, and then was becoming quite familiar with hearing the SP10 R in use on the Oak Table.

I become compelled to make the suggestion the TT was seated upon a Sub-Plinth, and using suspension footers for the separator between table and Sub-Plinth.

First to be dealt with was the R’s need for a Plinth, the same machine shop that produced the Glanz Mount Pod, produced the Plinth. There was a very strong suggestion across all who heard the TT on a Plinth, that the experience of hearing the sonic produced had changed to the point it seemed to be with a sonic that is more honest/ believable. At the time I was in agreement with this as a description.

The impact of the Plinth certainly got the thoughts going on a Sub-Plinth.

A 25mm Granite Plinth was acquired, at a minimum dimension, it is the same as the Plinth. I am a user of Granite for numerous years and have compared the material as a Plinth Material and Sub-Plinth to other material types and it does have a influence on the sonic in the environments I have experienced it used in. My own personal preference at present is to have Granite in use, even though Densified Wood is winning me over where it has been experienced in use, especially in the usage of Plinth and Sub-Plinth.

The footers chosen for the Granite are a not too expensive Spring Type. I am familiar with footers of all types and can say that out of them all used in the environments I have tried them, suspension types inclusive of pneumatic versions have proved to have the most attractive end result and are very capable of ’tidying up’ the sonic.

My experiences had of the newly mounted R and assessment made of the very positive impact the Granite Sub-Plinth and Spring Footers had on the SP10 R has been that the perception has been the R is now performing in a way that is a mimic and recognisable of the SP10 MkII that I own and have mounted on a purpose produced dedicated support. In my mind that suggests the improvement as a betterment was seemingly measurable and at the least notable.

The added Links show Two Footer Types that could be considered prior to considering adding a unobtrusive Sub-Plinth.

My go to footer today for lighter weight devices is earlier production model from the Brand Solid Tech ’Feet of Silence’. This has a similarity in design to SME Suspension, utilising Vertical Orientated ’O’ Rings.

The Link has a ’O’ Ring Suspension that is Horizontally oriented and has been seen offered as design for many years by different Companies.

It has now become a further point of interest to myself as it is this orientation of ’O’ Ring that has been adopted by both Solid Tech in their latest footer designs and even more interesting SME have adopted the method in their Latest £60K range of TT’s.

 

 

 

 

My use of Upper Case letters has caused a few to express their thoughts maybe even a little rile has been poked. I won't be accepting any blame for ones loss of their composure.

The Topic presented, along with comments offered, has produced a selection of interesting responses that have proved  beneficial to my own inquisitiveness. I have been served well by a few of the threads contributors.

I'm still more than happy to receive further views on the Threads Subject. 

 

The entertainment on offer is rivalling the fun had whilst at the Pantomime a few days past.    

I am diagnosed now, I hope by a time served and qualified professional. The Prognosis given solely based on the context of:

"I don't want to be rude of insensitive"

has suggested I am Abnormal. 🤣

Then we have the other individual who has never been face to face as part of a communication with myself. Not allowing for them to hear one word uttered from my lips, but this individual is quite happy to declare and is seemingly sure of their  I opinion of myself having "Compulsive Logorrhea" 😂. 

"Oh Yes You Did" 🤡   

@daveyf Your comments about Quantity of Vinyl LP's / Value if a LP's Collection is relevant.

In most cases the investment made for collecting LP's and producing a supporting Audio Set Up, have been a long-term venture. In the past, myself inclusive, it is typical for not expressing too much constraint when collecting LP's, the individual buy the items as they please. Maybe the breaks go on a little once a collection is where on classes as useful enough for their needs.

With the Audio Equipment used to replay the LP's, my experiences has shown that the individual expresses a different control on the attitude to how a purchase is made.  

I did not put emphasis on the LP Collection Value in the OP, I was expectant of certain individuals to declare their LP Source Material was surpassing the monetary value of selected tools used to enable the LP's to be replayed.