Critical subwoofer tip


I assume that everyone already knows the importance of phase matching a sub to the main speakers but it’s a little more complicated than simple 90 degrees or 180. The B&W sub that I have has four choices. In every case there has been a definite correct position that can be non standard. My current setup shined at 270 degrees vs the std positions. It’s completely obvious and the other choices would not have been satisfying. 
From my lengthy experience I would want a subwoofer with several phase choices. I personally don’t see how one could seamlessly integrate the mains and the sub without this flexibility. No one asked but i thought this info might be useful to anyone purchasing a subwoofer. YMMV
4425
mtmug-
I think it is safe to say that I am one of the confused ones. If we ignore changes in amplitude over time (impulses) and just stick with a sustained tone at a given frequency, how are two wave fronts 180 degrees out of phase not the same as two with the polarities reversed?
They aren't. The are the same. Your confusion stems from reading guys who sort of understand some of it, just enough to keep everyone else thoroughly confused.

If I had a sub with speaker level inputs and no phase control, I would expect swapping the speaker leads to produce the same effect as flipping the phase 180 degrees.

Correct. Same thing.  

Think of a 40Hz wave propagating out of a sub. The wavelength at 40Hz is about 28 feet. https://www.translatorscafe.com/unit-converter/en-US/calculator/sound-frequency-wavelength/  This means your room has to be at least 28 feet in every dimension, or else the wave will encounter a wall and reflect back and cancel itself. Before even one full wave.  

Of course no one's room is this big, and 40Hz isn't even the bottom, we want 20Hz, which use the web page, is 56 feet! Nobody but nobody has a room 56 feet on a side with a ceiling 56 feet high! Nobody! So ALL rooms are small, from the perspective of a sub.  

Take a room most would consider large, 17x30x9. Pretty good size room, right? Those dimensions in terms of wavelength work out to 66, 37 & 125 Hz, respectively.  

You see what happens? No matter where you put a sub the waves are all much larger than the room, and so they wind up reflecting and canceling or reinforcing themselves. You can physically move the sub around. All this will do is move the locations of the modes. You can reverse polarity. All this will do is move the locations of the modes. You can adjust phase. All this will do is move the locations of the modes. Changing location, phase, and polarity are all different sides of the same coin. All any of them are doing is moving around the modes. Same exact problem. Never goes away.

Notice there is zero chance any of this has anything to do with the main speakers. The mains are either too high in frequency to matter, or if they are at the same bass frequency then phase still doesn't matter, because they are just two more sources of the same problem. They still cancel and reinforce because the same wavelength physics applies to them as well.

When people notice profound effects and improved bass by changing phase, it is not because they have matched anything. It is because they have found a setting that is less lumpy at their listening location - for certain frequencies! Same goes for EQ. You can get it pretty good at one spot, but only by making it worse everywhere else.

This is why multiple subs works so well. More subs in more locations results in more modes, more areas of cancellation or reinforcement. Same problem. No getting around the physics. With more subs however then the output of each one can be less. Because each one is less then each mode is less of a lump. Yet add them all together, the result is the volume you want without the lumpiness you do not want.  

This distributed bass array concept by the way is one of the great audio developments of the last 50 years. This one simple move - four subs instead of one - enables anyone to have truly awesome bass in any room and for as little as $3k. Amazing. Yet hardly anyone is doing it, mostly as far as I can tell because the concept is hard to understand.

Well, do a search. Look around. The physics is rock solid. The results uniform and unimpeachable. Everyone who does it is blown away how good it works.
Enter MC's room  Raummoden Rechner - Trikustik to view nodes.

View MC's system Millercarbon's System - Virtual Systems (audiogon.com)

A combination of ported and unported subs with 20Hz capable mains are going to produce impressive, but never accurate low end.

Tekton MOAB have 17 distinct arrival time per channel. With 8 widely spaced LF [main woofers to 300Hz 1st order, down only 6db @ 600Hz] drivers [4 main and 4 sub] there will be lots of indistinct bottom.

MC once advised: " Here in Washington we have some sweet green bud that will get you there in one step: inhale."  in The 5 stages of making a bad audio purchase

I like my music as I heard it in the studio and the control room: Neat.

That is achieved by time and phase alignment of the sub, LF, mid and HF drivers. Full Stop.
That is achieved by time and phase alignment of the sub, LF, mid and HF drivers. Full Stop.

@ieales Yours is not the first mention in the discussion referring to the importance of time alignment. I don’t think I understand this in the context of low frequency behavior in a closed room.

For example, if my listening position is 10ft away from my main speakers, all frequencies above about 113Hz are arriving at the listening position from the speakers directly because all the frequencies at this level and higher have wavelengths of less than 10 feet. In contrast, frequencies below this threshold will require more than 10 ft to reach full amplitude because their wavelengths are longer than this. This means, to hear these lower frequencies, they have to bounce off at least one or more room boundaries. This would seem to indicate that all these lower frequencies arrive at the listening position later than the higher ones. In other words the higher frequencies would arrive at my listening position after traveling 10 ft, the 30 Hz frequency had to travel at least 37.5 ft, the 40 Hz traveled over 28 ft., etc. Since all the frequencies travel at about 1,125 ft/sec, the lower, reflected frequencies are all going to lag behind direct ones from the mains.

There was some suggestion that a delay could be applied to the subwoofer but it would seem for exact time alignment, you would have to apply a variable delay to all frequencies except for the lowest the system can produce to have them all arrive at the listening position at the same time. This seems pretty involved to me. Or have I missed the whole point again?