DACs and bass response?
- ...
- 107 posts total
Stuartk - I think you should address the CD transport before you get a new DAC. The source is at least as important as the D/A, maybe more. Before you drop $2500 on a new transport, consider a reclocker that will actually get you much lower jitter in the S/PDIF signal than a transport at a lower cost, and also provide for galvanic isolation to break ground-loops. You can still use your existing transport. The Synchro-Mesh with Dynamo power supply and BNC reference cable combination will do this. You could start with the Synchro-Mesh OTL and the reference BNC cable for $1100.00. This will get you jitter in the 25psec range. Here are some jitter plots comparing the SM to a popular transport: http://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=154408.0 Steve N. Empirical Audio |
stuartk As I mentioned in my first post, it has output coupling caps, that's why many owners on the net are changing that cap. If that cap is too small in uF (microfarads) it will roll off the bass too early giving a shallow subdued (cool) bass, increase this cap 3 x in uF and it should fix the problem and give you a deeper stronger bass. Or my preference is to direct couple, but you need a tech for that. Cheers George |
BTW, there are many different ways to implement ESS series chips, so can't just look at the chip used and say it sounds a particular way. Then there is the circuit layout, the section of and matching of various discrete components, etc. all can have effects on SQ - not like a speaker, but something you can hear in a spendy system |
Steve, What is your opinion on the stereophile J-test? It measures analog out of a DAC to a test signal - so it checks for both incoming and intrinsc jitter. What do you think of the typical SOTA DACs that have a noise floor at -150dB when tested for jitter? How can perfect performance be improved upon and what do you look for when testing an asynchronous DAC of this level and how could Synchro-mesh or another cable improve upon perfect? |
- 107 posts total