Deqx vs. Behringer or Dbx Digital Crossovers?

A good question to be sure. I might try asking it at:
http://www.madisound.com/
The forum there is mostly orientated to speaker questions. I bought the DBX ($500), as it was rated a bit better than the Behringer ($300). There are some Rane units, which are more money, and of course the DEQX which is very highly regarded.
If I had to guess, I'd say that units like the DEQX will probably be the wave of the future. Pre-amp, crossover, room equalization, DAC, etc all in one. I've read that the DAC is as good as some that cost between 1-2K$.
Right now I'm using the DBX as a crossover between my subwoofer and a two way speaker system. It has room correction which I will be trying soon. If I decide to bi-amp my two ways, then I would consider moving up to the DEQX.

Thanks for your comments guys.
I am already biamped. Triamped actually using the Behringer as a 3 way crossover with seperate amp channels for all drivers. It sounds very good. Very good! But with the quality of amps I have a passive crossover would sound very good if properly designed.

I am just trying to figure out whether the jump up to the DEQX would be a significant audible difference to my system.

Are there others who have made the jump from low cost digital (Behringer or DBX) to Deqx crossovers? Maybe most Deqx users have never used other digital crossovers?

Are there any direct comparisons in the same speaker system?

Thanks.

Are there any direct comparisons in the same speaker system

Uh, yes, see my post above! I'll add that the guy upgraded fm the Behringer to the Deqx. But, again, given the total cost of the spkr system, the Deqx was judged an acceptable outlay.

Finally I'll add my own comment: AFA crossovers go, a passive line-level could do the job well. It's the extra features (delays, phase, versatility) that prompted this friend to get the Deqx NOT the xover function alone. (He's triamped, too)

Sorry Gregm. In reading your post I didn't realize a Behringer was used in the system before the Deqx. I simply thought that you had heard a system with a Deqx. My bad.

Maybe I should just give the Deqx a try myself.
It's only money, right?
What choice do I have? Sit back and listen to the music?
No way!
Us crazy audio adicts always have to be fiddling with something.

I am also tri-amping a reference system (CAT-PASSx-600/Classe - IRSV) using simple Ashley (pro-PA type) Crossover, bypassing the built-in passive xovers in IRS-V. I am also wondering whether it is time for me to upgrade the single cheapest unit in my chain of sound. (Ashley cost me less than 1/10 of any of my units or some cables) Deqx, Accuphase DF-35 and Behringer are all contenders. The only reason I would change Ashley would be to go all digital in CD-DSP-Xover before D/A conversion for power-amps. Any body with real experience of sound improvement for having gone digital in these areas?