difference between Dolby Digital 5.1 and DTS 5.1?

The DTS track is always a larger file, how could they be the same? You will only need to strip both soundtracks to see this.

Dave

They are different encoding systems which do the same thing; i.e. produce 5.1 discrete channels.

DD 5.1 was first to market. It has a leg up because of that. DTS was later developed by technicians for Steven Spielberg's "Jurassic Park". In theory it is superior. It uses a higher data rate, 1.5 megabits/sec versus 384 kilobits/sec for DD 5.1 It also uses a lower compression ratio, 4:1 versus 10 or 12:1 for DD 5.1 The theoretical advantage is not often realized in practice, often because of limitations on the DVD itself which is used to hold the recorded material. This may disappear as DVD's which hold more information become more common. As long as your processor does both, everything is fine.

The key phrase in Markphd statement is "In theory it is superior." This is true, in theory it is supperior. However it is all relative to the source. The maximum bit rate for DVD's with mutiple soundtracks is 448 kps acording to Dolby and the DVD liscence agreement. However if the disc is a single soundtrack it can the use up to 754kps. This is the case on some superbit disc and special dts only editions (jaws,saving private ryan, etc.)

It is not a matter of what they are capable of doing, it is what they are limited to.

As far as the DTS soundtrack being a larger file than the DD file, it is because they are differnt file types. IE different languages and differnet decoders. They file size is not the issue in compression, it's the bit rate.

I always use DTS when it's available. I haven't really spent time A/Bing it though but I DTS generally sounds a bit deeper.

I think I understand a "bit" more than before.