difference between Dolby Digital 5.1 and DTS 5.1?

The key phrase in Markphd statement is "In theory it is superior." This is true, in theory it is supperior. However it is all relative to the source. The maximum bit rate for DVD's with mutiple soundtracks is 448 kps acording to Dolby and the DVD liscence agreement. However if the disc is a single soundtrack it can the use up to 754kps. This is the case on some superbit disc and special dts only editions (jaws,saving private ryan, etc.)

It is not a matter of what they are capable of doing, it is what they are limited to.

As far as the DTS soundtrack being a larger file than the DD file, it is because they are differnt file types. IE different languages and differnet decoders. They file size is not the issue in compression, it's the bit rate.

I always use DTS when it's available. I haven't really spent time A/Bing it though but I DTS generally sounds a bit deeper.

I think I understand a "bit" more than before.

I always listen in DTS now, when avaliable. I was A-B testing for a while and on some DVDs, DD sounded about the same. But on most discs the DTS track won out, and never lost. I think the major difference, to my ears, is that at times in the DD tracks you can point directly to where the speakers are, and in DTS the sound seems to fill the gaps in between. It's as if you are immersed or surrounded with the audio seemingly coming more from the sides, rear, and even above. Although, I have to admit, on movies like the new STAR WARS, the DD tracks are very good. DTS is not available on these.
Sonny