Do equipment stands have an impact on electronics?

mapman
13,828 posts
10-26-2016 5:19pm
PRoblem with Wikileaks seems to be that the sources are questionable and nothing to assure material is authentic. There is nothing to prevent material obtained from being doctored and how material is obtained seems very shady .

That’s precisely what the Dems are counting on, that people will think the emails have been doctored. Unfortunately it has been demonstrated they have not been doctored. Brazil at the DNC found out the hard way when she tried the "it's been doctored" defense several days ago, unsuccessfully.

That’s precisely what the Dems are counting on, that people will think the emails have been doctored. Unfortunately it has been demonstrated they have not been doctored. Brazil at the DNC found out the hard way when she tried the "it's been doctored" defense several days ago, unsuccessfully.

Those damn Russians!

So they say. ⚔️

My guess is Billy Bush.

And furthermore,

(from Internet analysis of the doctoring charge by Dems)

"So why doesn’t the Clinton campaign provide some evidence that emails have been doctored, like publishing original emails? Experts pointed to political calculation. By saying the emails may be inaccurate generally, the campaign can plausibly deny certain facts that the emails reveal. If they offer proof that a particular leaked email is fake, however, that risks giving the impression that any emails they do not refute are accurate. Or they just might not want the original email to become public for any number of reasons.  "It boxes the campaign into a bad spot," _______ said."

cheers