Meanwhile back at the ranch.......
I have received the Cambridge transport in question, and it’s a big improvement, right out of the box, on the Oppo 105D I’ve been using as a transport. We’ll see if it gets even better as time goes on.
Bad news: As I was attempting to make an A-B comparison between the two machines, the Oppo crapped out; wouldn’t power up, leaving one of my best sounding CDs locked inside.
Luckily, the Cambridge does handle SACD’s, so I can still play them, although not at the higher bit-rate.
One complaint about the machine’s remote: you can’t access different tracks easily, as there’s no numbers to push. Very primitive for a device dedicated only to CD’s. They save money and lose space by making the remote operate three separate devices.
Chintzy!
I have received the Cambridge transport in question, and it’s a big improvement, right out of the box, on the Oppo 105D I’ve been using as a transport. We’ll see if it gets even better as time goes on.
Bad news: As I was attempting to make an A-B comparison between the two machines, the Oppo crapped out; wouldn’t power up, leaving one of my best sounding CDs locked inside.
Luckily, the Cambridge does handle SACD’s, so I can still play them, although not at the higher bit-rate.
One complaint about the machine’s remote: you can’t access different tracks easily, as there’s no numbers to push. Very primitive for a device dedicated only to CD’s. They save money and lose space by making the remote operate three separate devices.
Chintzy!