@inna The Harbeths were unique. I don't know if it was their ported design, but it almost was like they were breathing bass on you. I felt like they had a bit more range down low. The highs were seamless thanks to the 3 way design, but to me lacked a little bit of realism. The Soul Supremes had a much tighter bass that went lower than expected, but you can see where adding a sub would complete the presentation. My wife and I go to see a lot of live music...blues, jazz, symphony and concerts. To me, the Zus delivered a much more life like and live sound. The tweeter definitely delivered a more realistic symbol strike and electric guitar sound.
Don't get me wrong, the Harbeths were amazing, but not at 3 times the price of the Zus. They also had more than $50,000 of gear driving them where the Soul Supremes had a $1,000 Peachtree 125(new unreleased model). This is an apples to oranges comparison and I'm obviously injecting my opinion here. Their rooms are about 20ft apart, so I'll try to give you a little bit better description tonight.
If I were going to sum up each speaker with one word:
Harbeth: Soundstage
Zu: Realism
Don't get me wrong, the Harbeths were amazing, but not at 3 times the price of the Zus. They also had more than $50,000 of gear driving them where the Soul Supremes had a $1,000 Peachtree 125(new unreleased model). This is an apples to oranges comparison and I'm obviously injecting my opinion here. Their rooms are about 20ft apart, so I'll try to give you a little bit better description tonight.
If I were going to sum up each speaker with one word:
Harbeth: Soundstage
Zu: Realism