2. digital
  3. 190974-70445

First impressions of new MH-DA006, Musetec flagship

I have received the 006 almost a week ago and have been breaking it in. The price at Shenzhenaudio is $3,900.00 USD, $600 more than the 005. The ad copy states:

"DA006 is a new generation of flagship DAC developed by Musetec over three years and launched in 2024. During this period, it has undergone more than ten revisions and adjustments.

Compared to the previous DA005, the listening experience of DA006 has been improved in all aspects. DA006 has clearer and richer details, a stronger sense of texture, a more stable sound base, better detail control, a wider soundstage, fuller and more powerful, smoother and more natural. . ."

Some brief listening during break in has been very very positive. I will report back when it has run at least 300 hours.

dbb
sns
3,202 posts
 

This also brings to mind attempts to generalize about usb vs I2S performance. I suspect individual setups could have quite different outcomes, optimized usb at both streamer and dac could surpass less than ideal I2S outputs from streamer. I do believe I2S at dac end is inherently superior to any usb as its native protocol in dac, one is simply adding all that usb complexity to signal path.

debjit_g
261 posts
 

Someone over at the other forum has compared PF I2S (w/ Ultra PF ocxo) with their USB counterpart (PF & JCAT) a while back and found they are at par - they sound different but none is better than the other. They both are of such high quality that it’s a matter of taste at this point. This tells that I2S is not always the superior input for DACs regardless of implementation. Some DACs will sound better over I2S, others not so much.

 

IMO, two things are needed to optimize USB from the server/streamer side - first is an excellent power supply and the secondly a good quality clock, preferably a good quality ocxo. Another thing that is often overlooked is the network side of things, like network interface, Copper vs Fiber Optics, downstream switches, etc. These play a major role in contributing to the SQ. Moreover, if you have a DIY server, the power supply to the server is important, so are the choice of dram module, low latency drive, OS optimization all contributes. If these things are not in order, the 2nd best solution is a well implemented DDC, like Denafrips Gaia or the Audio-gd DI-25HE.

 

Recently PF has introduced an Ultra USB Bridge (with in-built Ultra ocxo) that comes with a substantial hefty price tag (over $3k). Someone who tried it said it sounds substantially better. Well, at that price I won’t be trying it myself but I do plan to modify my JCAT XE to feed a good quality ocxo or get the JCAT ocxo board which is also a bit expensive for what it does but it has two 20Mhz outputs - so if you are using both USB and Network card from JCAT, then it might be beneficial. I use fiber out straight away from my server and hence I can’t reuse the 2nd clock as it.

 

flkin
25 posts
 

Agreed with the post above, the USB format still offers SOTA sounds. I have owned all 3 of them and from my listening, I found this in order of preference for the Pink Faun bridges:

1. Ultra USB bridge (built in OCXO and UC power)

2. USB v2 bridge (with the new firmware)

3. USB v1 bridge with OCXO card plug-in

 

I've also listened to the PF i2S bridge too but not in the same system. I think it slots in around the 2 level. i2S is good but is apparently very sensitive to connection disturbances. 

 

To get the most out of USB, one has to experiment with external power and cabling, both of which makes a difference.

More to discover