I have a pair of Gemme Katana speakers (version 2). I have not heard the Tanto's, but from reading reviews and talking to others, I get the impression there are a lot of similarities. I am currently running them (I switch between the Gemme's and Wilson W/P speakers) with a Pass Labs Aleph 5 which is rated at 60 @ 8 and 90 @ 4 ohms, all class A. This is a SS amp, but it is built in the tradition of a SET amp (I also own a 2A3 tubed SET amp), but with more "balls".
The Gemme speakers are very good in many regards. They will deliver what a lot of people or looking for. They are a lot more forgiving than my Wilsons (no surprise there). Yet they provide plenty of detail without ever becoming tiring. They are a smoother speaker - yet are not boring to me. The Katana does surprisingly well in bottom end, considering their driver size. This is reportedly due to their Vtech (I think is what they call it) design, which is a quasi (though I don't really see how) horn design. The Katana's do go down to the mid to lower 30s, which is really quite acceptable to me. I find them to be a fairly speedy speaker, surprising considering that they are somewhat forgiving (IMO). I often find "forgiving" speakers to feel slow or lack a degree of PRAT that I desire. The Gemme's do NOT bore me nor are they totally seductive. It should be noted, their soundstage is designed for a more further back row seat from center (ie. there is more depth behind the speakers than depth in front of the speakers). This is very counter to my Wilson's, but the Pass Labs amp may very well be contributing to this (as my Wilson speakers are further back sounding with this amp as well - I am on the quest to get another amp, if I do, I can update these notes). They have a fairly wide sound stage, certainly outside the speakers. They have fairly good focus - but not lazer like that one gets with the Wilson speakers.
The use the same drivers as Thiel, yet do so with a much easier to load/drive set-up. They are much less clinical or detailed sounding than the Thiels (which are much more like the Wilson's - FWIW I have owned both at the same time). I have tried the Gemmes with a 70 watt push pull tube amp, but didn't feel the match was perfect, a little too forgiving for my tastes.
I think they would be a pretty good match with Naim, but you should extrapolate my (and others) opinions on the "house" sound of the Gemme's to determine if that match may be good for your goals. I am in SW Michigan, so if you are close and want to bring your amp over and listen to my Katana's you are welcome to do so.
I think the Gemme's are very good speakers. I had mine before I bought my current pair of Wilson's (my 4th pair) and they are the first speakers I have owned at the same time as Wilson's that I just couldn't pull the trigger on to sell them (ie. the Gemme's). To me, that says a lot about them. It may also say that I like a detailed, drier speaker most of the time, but also like to have the Gemme's to fall back on when I am looking for a sound that may be a bit more forgiving.
Room placement is important to get the very best out of them. However, I frequently slide my speakers back into the corner of the room if I am entertaining. The Gemme's continued to sound very good even when so far out of position - that is commendable and something the Wilson's don't do very well. The Gemme's definately have a much larger sweet spot - but that may be attributed to the less lazer-like focusing versus the Wilsons.
The Gemme speakers are very good in many regards. They will deliver what a lot of people or looking for. They are a lot more forgiving than my Wilsons (no surprise there). Yet they provide plenty of detail without ever becoming tiring. They are a smoother speaker - yet are not boring to me. The Katana does surprisingly well in bottom end, considering their driver size. This is reportedly due to their Vtech (I think is what they call it) design, which is a quasi (though I don't really see how) horn design. The Katana's do go down to the mid to lower 30s, which is really quite acceptable to me. I find them to be a fairly speedy speaker, surprising considering that they are somewhat forgiving (IMO). I often find "forgiving" speakers to feel slow or lack a degree of PRAT that I desire. The Gemme's do NOT bore me nor are they totally seductive. It should be noted, their soundstage is designed for a more further back row seat from center (ie. there is more depth behind the speakers than depth in front of the speakers). This is very counter to my Wilson's, but the Pass Labs amp may very well be contributing to this (as my Wilson speakers are further back sounding with this amp as well - I am on the quest to get another amp, if I do, I can update these notes). They have a fairly wide sound stage, certainly outside the speakers. They have fairly good focus - but not lazer like that one gets with the Wilson speakers.
The use the same drivers as Thiel, yet do so with a much easier to load/drive set-up. They are much less clinical or detailed sounding than the Thiels (which are much more like the Wilson's - FWIW I have owned both at the same time). I have tried the Gemmes with a 70 watt push pull tube amp, but didn't feel the match was perfect, a little too forgiving for my tastes.
I think they would be a pretty good match with Naim, but you should extrapolate my (and others) opinions on the "house" sound of the Gemme's to determine if that match may be good for your goals. I am in SW Michigan, so if you are close and want to bring your amp over and listen to my Katana's you are welcome to do so.
I think the Gemme's are very good speakers. I had mine before I bought my current pair of Wilson's (my 4th pair) and they are the first speakers I have owned at the same time as Wilson's that I just couldn't pull the trigger on to sell them (ie. the Gemme's). To me, that says a lot about them. It may also say that I like a detailed, drier speaker most of the time, but also like to have the Gemme's to fall back on when I am looking for a sound that may be a bit more forgiving.
Room placement is important to get the very best out of them. However, I frequently slide my speakers back into the corner of the room if I am entertaining. The Gemme's continued to sound very good even when so far out of position - that is commendable and something the Wilson's don't do very well. The Gemme's definately have a much larger sweet spot - but that may be attributed to the less lazer-like focusing versus the Wilsons.