2. tech-talk
  3. 151126-123258

How many of you believe in MQA?

I have recently purchased a Bluesound Node 2i.  The dealer suggested I connect the Bluesound by way of digital coax to a Pro-Ject S2 DAC by way of RCA anologue to my ARCAM AVR550.  However, I found out I will not be able to control my Bluesound with an iPhone, iPad or PC notebook.  The only way to hear MQA completely unfolded is to plug in a computer USB.  This would mean I would have to get up from where I am sitting, go to the computer to change songs and albums.  I believe the Pro-Ject RS2 DAC would work, but not sure what the sales price is or if this is a good option.

The dealer asked me why I wanted to even bother listening to MQA completely unfolded when the DAC sounded better than the DAC inside the Bluesound.  He thinks MQA is way over rated and it may not be around a year from now.  If I hook things up with the Pro-Ject S2 DAC I will be able to hear one unfold which would be at 24 bit/88.2 kHz.  If I do this, I will be giving up the opportunity to hear MQA recordings recorded at 24 bit/96 kHz or 24 bit/192 kHz.  

How many of you are enbracing MQA?  
128x128larry5729
larry5729's avatar
larry5729 OP
1,009 posts
 
bkepke,

I did not realize there was a Bel Canto room at the 2019 RMAF?  I looked for them in the directory and was unable to see them listed as an exhibitor.  I really wanted to meet with them.  I wonder if you were referring to the 2018 show?

I wanted to go with the Bel Canto eOne streamer, but triple the price of a Bluesound was a budgetary concern.  I had just purchased a pair of REL S3 SHO's and adding another $1,600 would have really upset my wife.  I wonder how many of us have a wife factor to contend with?
Ag insider logo xs@2x
bkepke
3 posts
 
Larry
Bel Canto wasn't there. I said it was 2018 where I had them do the MQA vs. non-MQA demo. See 1st line of my 2nd paragraph.

Here is a high praise review for the e.One Stream at HiFi News:
https://www.hifinews.com/content/bel-canto-eone-stream-network-bridgedac
tinear123
241 posts
 
I don't know about over or under rated but MQA sounds good on my equipment.
rongold's avatar
rongold
49 posts
 
Is ‘believing’ in MQA anything like ‘believing’ in God? Asking for a friend.
iopscrl
200 posts
 

The industry wants to push consumers to a subscription model, and wants to ensure that consumers can not copy streaming content. Pay to play. It is always about the money, never about the consumer. MQA creates additional revenue streams because of licensing rights and may encourage additional hardware purchases to ensure compatibility with MQA content. The primary motivation for MQA is DRM, claims of sonic improvement are secondary, but used to sell the concept.

 The real problem is that MQA may represent a marginal at best sonic difference vs non MQA content. Marginal is not enough to convince enough consumers to open their wallets and invest (new hardware, new MQA media) in a new technology. Consumers only respond to paradigm shifts, not incremental change.  

 78 to LP

Mono to Stereo

Tube to Transistor

LP to Cassette

LP to CD. CD was deemed good enough, and attempts to "improve" it only succeeded at the margins. The masses never embraced SACD/DVD-A.

 In other areas: B&W to Color

VHS to DVD

Tube TV to Flat Screen.

 Film to Digital Photos

 But 3D largely failed, curved screens are difficult to find, and 4K is expensive marketing hype.

 Most consumers could care less about Quad, 8 Track, El Cassette, 3D TV, Curved Screens,

DVD -A, SACD, CD-HD and so on.

Guess which category applies to MQA ?   MQA started with hype and a large bandwagon. As pushback developed, and consumers failed to respond, several adopters quietly or abruptly dropped support. Others who were “considering” adoption have stopped issuing progress updates.  

 If you can hear a positive difference, great. But is the quality of the difference worth your investment of time and money ? 

More to discover