How Science Got Sound Wrong

In the war between Jacques Benveniste the immunologist that prove the"memory of water" and the science director of the science journal "Nature", where is the true scientist?


In the war between an homeopath for example and some scientist pick by chance in a forum thread, where is the true scientist ?


Beware, the ultimate result of this "quizz question" may change with time....Or what we call history... :)

Myself I am absolutely not a scientist, and cannot choose between these one, but I know that science is an ethical conduct of the consciousness  with the phenomena... Not a profession first, a power, a social class, or a work, not even a reputation nor a diploma , not even a study... First an ethical conduct and attitude of the consciousness toward phenomena, after that only all these qualities or categories … I apologize for my rant.... My best to all...

Speaking of memory of water... are you sitting down? Ice crystals form in different ways depending on the message written on a piece of paper.

https://youtu.be/tAvzsjcBtx8

If you gives this one to see, you will suffer the wrath of some...I know that you like to be provocative a little bit too much . :)

I propose carefully instead this one, and a more official and genuine discovery by the Nobel prize winner Luc Montagner and not less amazing in the same direction of research about water :


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8VyUsVOic0&t=2s

Uh, memory of water idea has not been proven but it’s pretty to think so. I.e., it’s purported to be true. Wink wink 😉 

geoffkait
Uh, memory of water idea has not been proven but it’s pretty to think so.

You are right in the collective sense of an accepted scientific truth...But way more than Emoto, the French Nobel Winner has years of works that proves it and he succeed to legitimate the great Jacques Benveniste whose research first 20 years ago has proved also " the water memory"...

This expression originates with Benveniste, whose reputation was destroyed in the process of proof...Montagner wanted to rehabilitate him by proving that he was right in the first place …"Nature" and John Maddox wanted to debunk his research ( implicating even James Randi) because their view of the world or science was contradicted by these waters memory and in the process kills the scientist reputation and life...A sad but revelatory story...


It will be more difficult to kill Luc Montagner...