I went from Class D to Luxman A/AB - And most of what you think is wrong


Hi everyone,

As most of you know, I’m a fan of Class D. I have lived with ICEPower 250AS based amps for a couple of years. Before that I lived with a pair of Parasound A21s (for HT) and now I’m listening to a Luxman 507ux.


I have some thoughts after long term listening:
  • The tropes of Class D having particularly bad, noticeable Class D qualities are all wrong and have been for years.
  • No one has ever heard my Class D amps and gone: "Oh, wow, Class D, that’s why I hate it."
  • The Luxman is a better amp than my ICEPower modules, which are already pretty old.

I found the Class D a touch warm, powerful, noise free. Blindfolded I cannot tell them apart from the Parasound A21s which are completely linear, and run a touch warm due to high Class A operation, and VERY similar in power output.


The Luxman 507 beats them both, but no amp stands out as nasty sounding or lacking in the ability to be musical and involving.


What the Luxman 507 does better is in the midrange and ends of the spectrum. It is less dark, sweeter in the midrange, and sounds more powerful, almost "louder" in the sense of having more treble and bass. It IS a better amplifier than I had before. Imaging is about the same.


There was one significant operational difference, which others have confirmed. I don't know why this is true, but the Class D amps needed 2-4 days to warm up. The Luxman needs no time at all. I have no rational, engineering explanation for this. After leaving the ICEPower amps off for a weekend, they sounded pretty low fi. Took 2 days to come back. I can come home after work and turn the Luxman on and it sounds great from the first moment.


Please keep this in mind when evaluating.


Best,

E
erik_squires
When I started this thread I was really worried that Goerge would have gotten too old and tired not to raise the same tired and irrelevant tropes he always does, but whatever held him back before, it's good to see he's recovered and fit as a fiddle, cutting and pasting the same things from the dozens of other threads on the subject.
This example suggests that it is far better to form opinion after listening to particular amp than making blank statements about whole class D.
I’m making blanket statements about all of class D for a reason.

A strong, stable, intelligent set of reasons. As in none of them ..class D, that is...performs. Nether in the listening, the engineering, or the execution (build).

It is still a turbo on a Honda civic --- trying to pose as a formula one car. As that is it’s origins. It was never meant for formula one use, never designed for it, at all. Never intendedd for it, no part of it's engineering or potential in build approaches what is required for such highfalutin use.

When the market involved finally has one that is engineered and manufactured properly, that works in a way that satisfies how the ear works and functions---- then get back to me (us).

Maybe in about 3-5 years. Maybe. No such luck yet.
I’m making blanket statements about all of class D for a reason.


To punctuate my original post: Bunk.
same tired and irrelevant tropes
Only in your own mind Erik, as you continue to start Class-D posts to get others validate your Class-D views and purchases because you can't yourself.  

Erik instead of burying your head in the sand about the problems that Class-D has had since it’s inception, with switching frequencies+filters, embrace instead the new GaN technology, that when used correctly as Technics has done with the SE-R1 can address those problems forever. At the expense of a little bit of heatsinking.

This then will put Class-D up with the best linear amps into the very hiend, instead of half of the audiophile not accepting it at all, because they hear things in the mids and highs you obviously can’t.