heaudio123"The crux of the discussion kevn (and andy2 and mahgister to some degree) is that you have no concept of how AI works, or can work, or how it is or can be implemented."
Actually what you’re remarks display and reveal and I will not quote them all here is that it is you that is unkowledgeable, uninformed, and inexperienced with AI and I know this because one of my companies is among the most advanced in the world in AI research much of which exceeds my ability to fully understand, assess, and comprehend however I have an extraordinary team of engineers, mathemeticians, and physicists who are capable of explaining to me the basic, fundamental, core aspects of the science which is how I know you are just wrong. You can dismiss, reject, and disqualify outright any thing you want without providing any valid substantiation, proof, or reference however such is not science you are acting on "feeling", intuition, and "gut" which is fine of course for discussion but that will not withstand examination, study, and scrutiny by those actually working in the field of science.
Actually what you’re remarks display and reveal and I will not quote them all here is that it is you that is unkowledgeable, uninformed, and inexperienced with AI and I know this because one of my companies is among the most advanced in the world in AI research much of which exceeds my ability to fully understand, assess, and comprehend however I have an extraordinary team of engineers, mathemeticians, and physicists who are capable of explaining to me the basic, fundamental, core aspects of the science which is how I know you are just wrong. You can dismiss, reject, and disqualify outright any thing you want without providing any valid substantiation, proof, or reference however such is not science you are acting on "feeling", intuition, and "gut" which is fine of course for discussion but that will not withstand examination, study, and scrutiny by those actually working in the field of science.