“Invest” in Tekton?


I’ve been a member of Audiogon for a while but haven’t really had the need to utilize the forums until now... I’ve perused the forums pretty extensively the past couple of days but haven’t really found my specific question.... First some background: I’ve had my current system for quite some time (PSB image: 5t, 9c, 2b, subsonic 6; Denon AVR3311 as preamp; and a NAD T955 amp) and have been pretty happy with it... yes, I tend to hold on to my stuff for a while.... I recently decided to explore the option of upgrading/updating my speakers and was pretty interested in some midlevel stuff (SVS Prime, Emotiva, PSB X2T, Paradigm 8, 9, or 10 something…) but ultimately decided the $2000-$3000 price tag wasn’t worth the investment as they were all roughly in the same league as my PSBs... Somehow, I stumbled upon the review of the Tekton double impacts... don’t even know how I found it but there I was... I kinda chuckled to myself when the reviewer started comparing them to $20,000 speakers and then started calling them better at some things... I was a little pessimistic about the review because in my aforementioned research every speaker was the greatest thing since sliced bread.. (To be honest, in my eyes, the professional reviewers lost some credibility because every speaker was just great, couldn’t find a bad review no matter how hard I tried...) Anyhow, the comparison to speakers 7-10x in price piqued my curiosity so I started snooping around for any Tekton reviews I could find and lo and behold, everyone loves them and the comparisons to speakers multiple times their price were plentiful. Ok, so the Tektons are good and now I’m more interested than I should be…

So here’s the rub… I’ve never even considered spending $5000-$6000 on a speaker system (5.0-5.1). Never in my wildest dreams… I’ve always had a theoretical limit of $3k and never gave anything above that a thought. Along comes Tekton with speakers that are in the 5-6k price range (5.0-5.1) but are being compared to speakers $20,000+ and the fact people are putting them in the same league as speakers in that price range, and saying they are better in some instances, is intriguing…

So here’s where I am asking for some assistance. It seems the Tekton lineup is a unique opportunity to acquire reportedly superior sonic performance with apparently unparalleled value. However, $5-6k is a TON of money in my world.. It won’t break the bank but admittedly, it bends it pretty significantly and spending this kind of money on speakers definitely wasn’t a consideration even a week ago… Personally, I am seeing this as a once in a lifetime purchase (am 43 and would expect these to be the last major speaker purchase of my life) but I do need to justify to my betrothed. My original sales pitch to her included the analogy “it seems they are selling Lamborghinis for the price of a Mustang…” and “I really don’t think there will be another opportunity like this” (when did I start selling timeshares???!!!) There are other barriers with her as well (e.g., “They’re how big?!”) but she does have somewhat of an understanding of how much I like music and stereo stuff.. somewhat…

So my actual questions:

  1. To those that have actually heard the speakers, (transducers?)… do you really feel they are leaps and bounds better than typical speakers in the 3-6k range (generally speaking…)? For comparison, I liked the SVS Ultras but due to price and size (yeah, I know how big the Tektons are..) I put them in the “maybe someday” category. To be clear, I’m not asking is “x better than y?” but rather “Do these $3000 speakers really belong in the same class as $20,000 speakers????

  2. In your humble opinions, is this really a rare/unique opportunity with unparalleled value that is a “once-in-a-lifetime opportunity” or are situations like this (incredible value for the money) more common?

  3. I can’t even claim to have a basic understanding of electronics, I’ve read up on ohms and what not and my eyes glaze over.. I spoke with Eric and he, without hesitation, stated my NAD T955 would be plenty sufficient to run whatever options I went with. Thoughts? I intend on using the NAD until it dies (hopefully no time soon) and will deal with next steps when the time is right…

  4. I am super nervous about ordering something so expensive unheard, If anyone is interested, I would like to have a discussion relating to my type of music and listening environment/levels.. (not including in this post to keep size down..)

  5. Any other relavant information I haven't considered, particularly in the area of justifying a purchase such as this?

There are probably 100 other little tidbits I could include in this but I am trying to be as brief as possible and I still wrote a novel… Anyhow, any productive assistance would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!

la10slgr
but listening to music on headphones is a completely different experience than listening through speakers.  you don't feel headphones moving your body and the furniture.  there's something to be said for that...
+1 toddverrone. Headphone systems are great but not the same experience as speaker ones are. Putting together a dedicated listening room is a great experience.

With awareness that many of my suggestions have previously been mentioned, I would In this case (small 9x11' room), develop a near field system, based on a pair of two way monitors selected based on considerations for room size, speaker placement and room treatment. Then find a compatible integrated amplifier and desired source components.  

If possible I would consider placing speakers along the 11' wall. I would consider putting equipment rack to either side of listening position. This will provide opportunity for largest soundstage, an advantage over headphone listening.

I would consider treating walls behind speakers, at 1st reflection points, behind listening position, and the use of bass traps in corners. I am a DIY guy with this approach. Look up ATS Acoustics, Piper City, Illinois, a great source for information and products (no affiliation, just a customer).

Again, selection of speakers need to be made based on the aforementioned considerations.

Enjoy the process, you will be rewarded.


I was just thinking of mentioning a near field setup. Great minds.. apparently mediocre minds too!
@toddverrone: 

: ) "you don't feel headphones moving your body and the furniture.  there's something to be said for that..."  Yes, in fact, a massage chair. : )

Hey guys, thanks for keeping the conversation rolling!!! As I mentioned, I really appreciate your input as I am getting exposed to a lot of information and you guys are forcing me to really think through and define my objectives… 

+2 toddverrone regarding the headphones...I appreciate the suggestion David_ten but headphones are not the route I want to go

Now, regarding monitors....

  1. I hear you guys on the size of the room and monitors being a logical fit.. I have looked into a couple and by the time you get the speakers and do something about stands we are right back into the same monetary ball park as towers…
  2. I know there are some amazing monitors out there but my preference is to have at least 3 different drivers to allow each one to focus more specifically on a particular frequency range, thus, I prefer towers (other reasons as well but I’m trying to work on that succinct thing…)
  3. Having said all that, I will go out and audition some monitors just to make sure I am not missing something (I asked for suggestions so who am I to thumb my nose when they come???
Now, I hear y’all regarding putting these huge towers (DIs) in such a tiny room. Not a single objection from me on that… However, by the time I get a smaller tower, with say 6.5 inch (maybe up to 8 inch) drivers, that necessitates a sub for the lower frequencies, say below 35-40hz.. So by the time I invest in a $1-2k set of towers, and a sub (or two depending on options) I am pretty much in for $2-3k…. Further, ignoring room size for a minute, I have found the larger towers have a preferable sound when compared to the smaller towers (I can comment on the SVS Ultras vs. Prime specifically) and am looking for the sound that comes from bigger towers… in a tiny little room…

 

So, knowing I want to stick with towers, Let’s get it on the table I am not married to the DIs by any means... I have had suggestions for XTZ and Zu Audio come my way and am in the process of looking into them.. 

So I guess these are my parameters:

  1. Towers with at least 3 drivers
  2. Big tower sound quality in a little room (11x9 give or take…) I feel safe saying this is a key component of what I am looking for…
  3. 2.0, 2.1, 2.2 is an option

Here’s my thought process on Tekton:

(DIs, $3k, Electrons $2750, Enzo 2.7 $2k, not really interested in other models)

DIs vs Electrons: Why give up the higher performing specs to save $250 and maybe/maybe not need a sub?

DIs vs Enzo 2.7: Enzo is only rated to 40hz so most likely need sub.. add on $800 and we’re right back up to nearly $3k… that’s assuming a sub is necessary.. If not, we have a logical option here…

So as far as Tekton is concerned, it’s pretty much the DIs or bust (with the Enzo 2.7 no sub option noted).. I even looked up the monitors and at $2k + sub that gets right back into the same mess…

I did like the sound of the SVS Ultras ($2k) but as I mentioned somewhere, I couldn’t determine if a sub would/wouldn’t be helpful as the room I auditioned them in was pretty crummy for low frequencies… the SVS subs were pretty much invisible…

Enter your text ...