kef 104/2 or Thiel 2.3

I own both KEF 104.2's and Thiel 3.5's. And, like someone
already mentioned, they are two different animals.

Speakers tend to reflect the taste of the designer. Although my Thiels are an older model, most all Thiels are
cut from the same cloth. Their balance is definitely tilted
upward. Jim T. likes em on the brighter side, so careful
system matching is important. When matched properly, they can be very detailed and sweet, but if your electronics are
even a little on the bright side, you'll find yourself running for the volume knob more often than not.

The KEF's, on the other hand, are a more evenly balanced
speaker and tend to be less fatiguing. They are also more
dynamic and far more efficient at 92db than the Thiels.
They can be driven by as little as a 15W SET amp and still play beautifully.

It's a tough call, you picked two excellent speakers, but
if i had to choose, i'd probably lean a little toward the
KEF's for long term listening.

Thiel CS 2.3

what art said, Kef's get the midrange right no exception and work out from there that said the 104/2 had the 'British' sound much like the B&W 801 of the time without the bass. thiels of that era were too bright/etched for my taste but I can't listen to martin logans either. so if your system is all analog and you need speakers that will wake up the room Thiel all the way otherwise roll with kef.

The Jim Thiel era Thiels have a treble that can easily do wonders or go bad. The difference seems to be if you listen to a lot of vinyl and/or use tubes. Then it may be heavenly for you.

If you are all digital with SS gear, avoid it.

Another set of alternatives from the era are the Vandersteens of course.

Of course, ALWAYS listen for yourself. This is just cheap advice given in case you have no ability to listen yourself.

Best,


Erik

All digital with SS gear and Thiel's here