Krell FBP200C/Rowland 112/ ??


Krell KRC-3 preamp with B&W 803 speakers anybody have any comments on either amp. I have heard some say Krell with B&W is to edgey. Does the Rowland 112 have enough power and bottom end with 150 watts?
itsalldark
If you can afford it in your budget, the Rowland 10 is SIGNIFICANTLY better sounding than the 112. IMO of course.
i just bought a Rowland 112 used to power the bottom end of my soon to arrive Kharma Exquisite 1ds in a bi-amp setup. the Kharma is a true 8 ohm speaker even in the bass. everything i have heard and read has mentioned the perception of control and power in the bass of the 112.

i haven't listened to it yet so i can't comment if it will fulfill my expectations. as i recall the 803s go to about 35hz in the low bass but are 4 ohm speakers. that load should be fine for the 112.

there is a a review on Soundstage;

(http://www.soundstage.com/revequip/rowland_112.htm)

by Todd Warnke that states the 112 has "full, deep, and articulate bass".

e-mail me in a week and i'll give you my listening impressions.
I bought a used KSA-150. I prefered it to the newer FBP amps. I am driving Snell C/V. I cant imanage needing more power. I think the FBP is more up front than the Rowland its a matter of preference you need to lisen to both and let your ears decide.