Hans Beekhuyzen Review:
Showing 12 responses by campo007
Thanks @lanx0003 |
Thanks @jackd. This is exactly the review I’ve been wanting to read. |
@lanx0003 right now with just 10 hours on it, I’d say the Harmony has the same width as the R26. The depth is still a little flat, but it is showing signs of opening up. The unit still sounds new and constrained. The top end still needs to open up. Dynamics are also a little flat. It’s showing some signs of being amazing. The bass is deep and impactful. The midrange is sweet and beautiful, much sweeter than a fully run in R26. Acoustic instruments sound spot on, very natural. I’ll report back once it’s has 100-200 hours on it. These are my first impressions 10 hours in. Early days yet. |
@wig , good to know. Thanks heaps!
|
@soix while the Harmony and the May share a beautiful natural timbre, the May is more micro and macro dynamic. The soundstage is much wider and the sound is more robust. |
@lanx0003 I have it running 24/7. Either streaming or a CD on repeat. Will report back in a few days with a 100 hour report. |
Hi @lanx0003 , unfortunately for the group - no. But for me yes. I had the opportunity to buy a Holo May 3 KTE and I jumped at it. And if I can be completely honest, it’s an amazing DAC. I have since sold the Harmony. I sold the Harmony with only 40 odd hours on it. I know will be not looked upon favourably for that, with people saying I still haven’t heard the Laiv at its best. They may be right. But I can tell you, the May is many steps ahead of the Harmony. That’s me being polite. I’m not saying the Harmony was bad. I think for the price it’s great. It was much better than my R26. But it falls short compared to what the May offers in my system. |
@kereru I’m feeding the DACs with an Auralic Aries S1 with external PSU, and a Shanling ET-3 CD transport. |