Marantz vs. Emotiva

I also knew somebody who had a Emotiva processor (I can't remember if it was a UMC-1 or UMC-200).  They had problems with it also, and switched over to a Marantz receiver instead.  They loved the Marantz.  I have listened to the Emotiva receiver (basically a UMC-200 with a 7 channel amp).  It is on the cold side.  The Marantz will be warmer and probably a lot more musical.

dbw1, I'm just a "fly-on-a-wall" with this thread because while I have no familiarity with either component you mention herein, I do have two pieces of Emotiva gear I'm happy with, so I'm concerned with the lack of servicing you have experienced. Have you asked for a replacement? FWIW I have a ERC-3 CD player and CMX-2 power conditioner.

I have not asked for a replacement. Their service model does not seem great. It's mostly communication by email. I'm not too concerned with the "musicality" as I have separate components for music. I'm just wondering if the Marantz would be a step backward for HT in terms of sound quality. Thanks all. 

dbw1, irrespective of your intention by virtue of this thread to understand if the Marantz would be a step backward in terms of sound quality, if you have purchased an Emotiva product and are not completely satisfied because of a manufacturers defect while the product is still under warranty, you should be entitled to a refund or replacement. My recommendation is to call Emotiva and ask for Lonnie Vaughn. Explain your situation and at least make an attempt to be fairly compensated.