2. amps-preamps
  3. 152580-94555

Mark Levinson integrated powerhouse with all the bling

No! Class-D inside this beauty.
Linear Class-A/B and delivers good current into low loads, most probably BJT output, also has "bling" a dac and phono stage inside, heavy at almost 30kg
Remains flat in frequency response regardless of loading, (no tone control behavior like many do) 

And can do respectable wattage's down into 2ohms
133.5Wpc into 8 ohms 
210w into 4 ohms
370w into 2 ohms 
 
At $8K would have to be a contender for those wanting an integrated that can handle hard to drive speakers.

https://www.stereo.net.au/reviews/mark-levinson-ml5802-integrated-amplifier-review

https://www.stereophile.com/content/mark-levinson-no5805-integrated-amplifier

Cheers George
128x128georgehifi
georgehifi's avatar
georgehifi OP
10,312 posts
 
ML is one of those brands which, after I heard it, I could understand why everyone talks about how good it measures.
Whatever is meant by that.

But I will follow up and say most ML amps are big, effortless sounding, with massive sound stage, extended both ends and never ever sound hard, or stressed, and usually can drive everything, if anything their sound is a little on the dark side of neutral.

Cheers George
Ag insider logo xs@2x
hk_fan
445 posts
 
It's very popular to bash ML, it reminds me of the Bose bashing.  You aren't a true audiophile unless you talk down both brands.  It's utter nonsense but it must make the people doing the bashing feel oh-so superior to those of us who like ML.
georgehifi's avatar
georgehifi OP
10,312 posts
 
it must make the people doing the bashing feel oh-so superior to those of us who like ML.
Yeah superior plebs, who have no idea how good ML electronics were, amps or digital.

Cheers George
no_money
638 posts
 
I replaced a 320S, 332, 360S combo with the 5805 after a lightning strike. ( the amp survived but... )
I have been very happy with the results, and now have a 5101 on order.
More to discover