I am an audiophile (at least that is what my wife says as she looks at the Big Rig)--and I use a Mac c2300 and MC 501 mono power amps. I am neither a doctor nor a lawyer (that is what your dealer may be referring to--mac was branded many years ago as hi-fi gear that only people in those professions could afford and thus was not audiophile grade but more "look what I can afford" gear).
Mcintosh C220 vs CJ ET-2
I am getting ready to buy a tube pre-amp to go with my pair of Monarchy SE-100 MK2 monoblocks. These drive NHT VT 2.4 speakers.
I was researching the McIntosh C220 and I went into a store... The guys there reccommended a Conrad Johnson ET-2 over the McIntosh and said it will go better with my speakers and my turntable (MusicHall MMF 5.1 with Goldring 2200 MM cartrige).
They claimed that the Conrad Johnson pre-amps have more defnintion and are true "audiophile" equipment....
Q1. Why is the Conrad Johnson considered audiophile quality and Mcintosh C220 not?
Q2. The price point is similar - so is one truly "better" than the other... I know I know that "depends" on how it sounds in my system... but I am curious to hear what others think...
Thanks in advance for your responses...
-Anu
I was researching the McIntosh C220 and I went into a store... The guys there reccommended a Conrad Johnson ET-2 over the McIntosh and said it will go better with my speakers and my turntable (MusicHall MMF 5.1 with Goldring 2200 MM cartrige).
They claimed that the Conrad Johnson pre-amps have more defnintion and are true "audiophile" equipment....
Q1. Why is the Conrad Johnson considered audiophile quality and Mcintosh C220 not?
Q2. The price point is similar - so is one truly "better" than the other... I know I know that "depends" on how it sounds in my system... but I am curious to hear what others think...
Thanks in advance for your responses...
-Anu
- ...
- 13 posts total
- 13 posts total