**MID + ** Woofer**. So you are saying this speaker can voice both fq's?
**Mid** + **Tweeter** , Again same idea, both lower highs (mids) + high fqs, voiced in one unit.
Is this what Seas ScanSpeak, SB Acoustics is claiming?
I don't believe it.
I just ain'ty buying.
In my research/experimentations, the one struggles in fq's above say,,ohh I dont know, maybe 1800hz, TOPS, ,,IF THAT..,,and the **Mid** /tweeter , attempting fq's below,,,oh I dont know, lets say 3k hz.
There
's a signifucant gap there folks, and worse of all, the 1600 - 3khz, is the very heart, sould life bllod of our music.
Especially my classical cd collection, where core mid fq's, is everything.
I dont know what say you?
Here's where my dual FR shine in the super duper critcal fq mid-zone.
All my 1950's operas never sound so live, as if you are on the front row seat. Higher sens + seamless mid range. Huge advantages over your commercial/consumer box speakers.
*Mid* woofer + *Mid* tweeter, nice try but no cigar.
Note:: have you seen what all the big labs are doing lately,,, sticking a whole bunch of speakers ina cabinet , in a vain, worthless attempt to equal what a Full Range can perform in the mid core fq band width.
More does not, never did, never will fill in a hz range that is not in their ability to voice.
Redundancy. Louder , for sure,
But the flaw remains.
You will not understand this post unless you actually place a FR next to your speaker.
I m talking Wilson;s Monolithic towers, with 6-8 speakers in each cabinet.
