Mitigating the Bubble

Normally you test the product then you sell it.

My crystal ball tell me that one of the following will happen:

1. There will be no results published
2. You will have to sign and NDA to get the results (that should be public)
3. The results won’t be very good, but lots of excuses will be made
4. The results will be published in a way such that the experiment is highly questionable and cannot be replicated. I.e. all the critical information required in typical test such as this will be missing so as to make the results meaningless.

I am guessing 1 or 4 based on a history of his other products where no meaningful test results have been provided, what is provided is not really interpretable or usable due to lack of data, or excuses have been made why it is unavailable.

I would ask what possible reason you would have for applying elemental boron to anything but I fear you would actually tell me.

In the form of mined borax it is great cleaner, mould inhibitor, and insect destroyer..

@nano-flo

G, I don’t want to twist your arm to test it for yourself, but my new nanomaterial has been tested by those on this group and I am just repeating what they said. Since I am to launch on Amazon anyway, I arranged to have a certified EE lab run various testing on as much as they can test. I should have the test results back from the VA lab in a couple weeks,

Chris, here lies the problem: You clearly stated earlier in this thread that your product “improves electrical conductivity”. You stated it! It seems pretty clear at this juncture that you have no data that it does. Conductivity is easy to test and you haven’t actually done it. Either you had conclusive data in advance of making the conductivity claim or you didn’t, which is it?

Subjective claims made by third parties are just that and I have no problem with sincere people relaying what they think they hear. If their soundstage blew over their framed internet diploma certifying their proficiency at spotting aliens…cool! You on the other hand have attempted to occupy the high ground and yet, I consider your claims as guesswork mixed with wishful thinking if I’m being generous. Your power cable offering is absolutely an insult to anyone with even a rudimentary knowledge of the hobby. That’s a swing bridge too far!

You are riding through town, wearing a white hat that doesn’t fit. Your claims to what your product may or may not do is very much akin to the historical snake oil salesmen of the old west. Cures gout, the common cold and those achy joints, regrows hair and doubles the mpg of your ‘88 Civic. Since this is an audio site, the least you could do would be to specify whether your Lexus test system is equipped with the base audio system or the Mark Levinson system. Is cassette tape the preferred media or FM or CD or satellite radio? I believe you should stick to Amazon…if you are wise and reasonably honest, you won’t spend any of the money the gullable send your way…I predict high levels of people taking you up on the money back guarantee, especially on your miraculous power cable.

So, back to your generous offer. Did you test conductivity in advance of making the claim or were you being dishonest when you stated that it increased conductivity? Its a simple question. Yes or no. If you did not then you were being dishonest when you made the claim. I don’t knowingly do business with people who would do that and since you apparently don’t really know what your product does, why would I smear it on anything? Free or otherwise.

@nano-flo - so right here is where I publicly apologise to you and correct a mistake I have made. Through misunderstanding, I claimed that Krissy had paid you for the original sample products, I have been informed that you have spoken the truth on this particular matter. As I understand it, and correct me if I am wrong, she paid for shipping and chose who the trial participants were?

Tom worked out who you were, and wasn’t given or even suggested by Krissy to contact you. Mr Carbon as you call him, was at least right, that price for that cable was never a good idea, nor the choice of off the shelf cable, but more to the point the price you’re asking. And if you didn’t believe Krissy when she told you that cable and price wasn’t going to go down well, you can digest this thread and the above post. (how much products have you sold with her help, compared to without? that’s entirely rhetorical by the way).

The original price and original straightforward offer for the product is a fair one, I certainly thought so when I paid for it. I have never said it wasn’t what I originally posted about it. Your selective responses are very telling, sadly for the audiophile community the real loss is a great product.

My mistake Krissy sent me the small test kit supplied to her for free by Chris. If she paid the shipping I will pay her for that service. Tom