2. misc-audio
  3. 176125-267

Mitigating the Bubble

Today after many years of trials and tribulations I have mitigated a sonic aberration a horizontal phase anomaly in my center stage.  While the center image was always stable and outlined it seemed narrow and bubble like and I would need to shift my body angle to really lock in the image. This was obvious on many CDs and LPs .

I have many man made fixes that helped the situation but never a total cure. Some of these are now permanent fixtures on the ceiling in 2 different locations. I made my own acoustic panels filled with long hair sheep's wool and 3 Argent Room Lenses.  I have laminar flow lenses that focus and stabilize the image across the front stage. I have built and treated an acoustic fan that overcomes the  boundaries with in my room by reducing interference. I have loaded my speaker cabinets 3 times with new drivers and now an outboard crossover. This was after my Essence 30s speakers and my Dunlavy SC4s.  ..All my components are hard mounted and direct coupled to the floor...on rock solid racks and speaker stands, custom mono bloc amps each on their own stand. All of these devices and angles and positions made the image wider and more focused but I still had that little  bubble and shift before me. Always less annoying with each new device and tweak.

So, your probably saying to yourself hurry up and get to the end. The end finally arrived today after having applied a contact enhancer 7 days ago to just 6 RCA ends out of many connections in my system.  Today with a friend who has been here a hundred times sitting in the Chair playing the same music as usual he said there was a wider sweet spot. I despise that term but he said it and not me.What we both heard was a super stable center image that was a few feet wide and not just one. The bubble was gone. The head in the vise was gone.  Off came the straight jacket and helmet. What I have now in this space intime is a glorious fully extended soundstage with all the meat on the bones and the features of talking heads on a real live performance stage. 

I have probably used eight different contact enhancers over five decades but this one blows my mind. This product  Nano Flo is the ultimate in transparency. 

Tom 

 

theaudiotweak
jerryg123's avatar
jerryg123
3,429 posts
 

@ghasley I really do not think @nano-flo has a shred of dignity or a conscience. 

Looking at his business history he has moved from one scam (oil additives) to another (gun oil and cable goop). 

With this in mind and that the amount that Chris has absconded with ($4000.00)? Glory should contact the AG in Illinois and file a complaint for Grand Theft and this could be Wire Fraud also.

How much money stolen is a felony in Illinois?

$500 in value, or theft of property exceeding $500 and not exceeding $10,000 in value, is a Class 3 felony. $500 in value, or theft of property exceeding $500 and not exceeding $10,000 in value, is a Class 2 felony if the theft was committed in a school or place of worship or if the theft was of governmental property.

ghasley
2,506 posts
 

@jerryg123

 

Glory’s best remedy is still through Ebay and Paypal and his credit card company.

 

Our best remedy as fellow audio enthusiasts is to ensure that Chris Arnold and Nano-Flo are radioactive when it comes to fleecing any more of our fellow audiophiles. I will hold out hope that Chris is working through something personal and will eventually do the right thing.

 

Regarding legal remedies, is it theft or is it fraud? I have three different law firms on auto dial but if they answer the telephone its an automatic $500 and the clock starts ticking by the quarter hour. I'm not that curious LOL.

nano-flo
100 posts
 

I have copied pages 12, 13 & 14 of this thread. 
gary Anderson has lied repeatedly to to you and several members have joined in blind attacks against me, me invention, company, intellectual property, Mike G and stereo times. Slander, defamation of character, liable, disruption of business are serious issues, including spreading these slanderous rantings to other forums. 
gary paid $1500 a cable, not $7500 and he has lied repeatedly to gain the favor of a few of you. He refused a refund and wanted the cables and MORE. He’s also lying about contingent of selling his Hemingway to pay for these, however eBay has all that documentation. Cease and desist. 
Chris Arnold, Nano-Flo, NanoFlo. 

jerryg123's avatar
jerryg123
3,429 posts
 

@nano-flo  Sorry you are not getting the benefit of the doubt.

No, I will not cease and desist. 

Did you read this rubbish you posted? 

Have you been drinking? 

​​​​​​​I had a stroke, and I am more coherent than you.

Be a man and give Glory his refund. 

I have copied pages 12, 13 & 14 of this thread. 
gary Anderson has lied repeatedly to to you and several members have joined in blind attacks against me, me invention, company, intellectual property, Mike G and stereo times. Slander, defamation of character, liable, disruption of business are serious issues, including spreading these slanderous rantings to other forums. 
gary paid $1500 a cable, not $7500 and he has lied repeatedly to gain the favor of a few of you. He refused a refund and wanted the cables and MORE. He’s also lying about contingent of selling his Hemingway to pay for these, however eBay has all that documentation. Cease and desist. 
Chris Arnold, Nano-Flo, NanoFlo. 

thecarpathian's avatar
thecarpathian
4,628 posts
 

The word your looking for is libel, not liable.

And slander doesn’t apply as that pertains to the spoken word.

How can we defame your character?

You don’t have any...

And which Gary are you talking about since you have two of them confused with each other. Did you straighten that one out yet and take down your libelous statement about our Gary?

More to discover