mono or stereo? (classe or ?)

Sorry. I should have probably made my post more detailed. I could buy another classe ca-100 for $750 and use them as monos or would it be better to sell the one I have and buy one stereo amp for about $1500 used? What would give me the best sound? I would love to here the gear you guys mentioned but it's just to much. any other recommendations?

I have found, in general and at that price level, that if you use a 200w stereo amp, it will sound more effortless than two 100w bridged stereo amps. I bridged two bryston 3b's compared to one 4b and found the above to be true. It all depends on the sound you are trying to attain. Anyone, please correct me if I am misinformed.

I was referring to the one Krell amp. Like I said, monoblocks do have advantages. I've not heard two of your amps as monoblocks directly compaired with mine, but I did compare mine to Musical Fidelity XA-200 monoblocks, and it easily beat them in every performance aspect. It would only cost you $500 more than $1500. Good luck.

Hi Kacz, Mono amps are generally preferred. My engineering and listening experience over twenty years is that you are generally getting more power supply head-room and better regulation per channel with mono amps. This is huge plus for sound quality. Some stereo amps have mono bridge option. Bridged operation sound quality varies more from amplifier design approach. Most reviews cover this, and so check that out on yours. If your speakers have bi-wire capability then there is another preferable option. You can run a stereo amp behind each speaker. Wire the single stereo amp this way with one speaker output going to the treble and the other going to the bass on the same speaker. This has worked very well for me in the past, others, in my listening circles. Maybe a very good way of adding 2nd classe amp model to your system without having a bridge operation capability. Today, I run Audio Note Ankoru's mono block per speaker. cheers, Gerrym5