Artists can unite by having their work streamed as intended in non-MQA format by going to Qobuz or HighResAudio.com.
It’s good to know there are alternative avenues.
It’s good to know there are alternative avenues.
MQA•Foolish New Algorithm? Vote!
Proper research is coming: https://secure.aes.org/forum/pubs/ebriefs/?ID=685 |
@jon2020, Thanks for sharing the news on HRA hi-res streaming. It’s would be very interesting to read reports on how hi-res streaming stacks up against MQA. I have been anxiously waiting on Qobuz to enter US territory for a while. HDTracks announced their plans to introduce hi-res streaming late last year but since then we have heard nothing. |
I believe the young generations demand for high quality “video” will make bandwidth and speed of the net- and the quality of cellphones- such that compression of/for -audio- will become irrelevant. I’m sure the big players are well aware of this. Therefore this attempt to capture the market will shortly reveal itself for the simple attempt at a “money grab” by the tech company and the industry “investors”/- or should they better be called “co-owners”?? |
No. It's just another way to add more processing to music and add artifacts. I've read some of the test results on MQA and it doesn't seem to quantitatively provide much benefit over standard methods but does add unnecessary artifacts, especially in the higher frequencies. Given modern day technology, we should be striving to have less processing and more precision ( 24 bit or higher ) to get closer to the vinyl sound. |