Neil Young calls out Tidal

You are right about the derailing of this thread...

But the actual  general censorship explain some reactions like mine here...

For the rest of your post claiming non vaccinated must die in their house, this reflect the complete hysteria and mass manipulation behind so much completely insane medical politic...

The fact that you are unable to see that reflect not only your lack of understanding about the situation ( forced massed vaccinations) but also your complete ignorance of medecine ethic and simple epidemiology about corona air borne virus whish ask for low cost treatment of the non problematic population and the vaccination targetting ONLY at risk people.. This is the sane medical politic...and a democratic act instead of inforcing mass stupidity and vaccines even for childrem or pregnant women... 

People are just stupid and ignorant, you can’t argue with that ever.

I will not add anything...

@mahgister You can’t have your cake and eat it too. You want to have the freedom to not be vaccinated, at the expense of people dying from car accidents, etc, that they didn’t have to. That is highly unethical.

I am all for you having your choice, but the moment your choice forces someone else’s death, you are morally and ethically liable for this. And as you made that choice, you can and should be held liable for this in my opinion. No medical treatment if there is not room for you, and you must pay 100% of the cost for the treatment yourself.

The type of hypocrisy you live by when you try to argue away the consequences of your choice is ridiculous, and should be called out. You made a choice, now you need to live with that choice at your expense, not the expense of others. 

As for the censorship, again, it the show was called."One idiot talking to another idiot about things neither understand or know anything about" then it would be one thing. However, it is not called that. And Joe Rogan treats every one of his performance artists the same, regardless if they actually have some knowledge on the topic at hand, or not. That leads the masses who wants to live in their own echo chamber to believe things that are just not true.

Sorry but you dont understand where this FALSE alternative come from; be vaccinated and be treated or be unvaccinated and not treated...

This come from UNSCIENTIFIC forced MASS vaccinations which is INSANE science imposed by hysteria and corporations...

Then the alternative you see as rational is pure dementia entertained by the dictatorship of big corporations NOT MEDECINE SCIENCE...

Suffice to cite many great scientists who say the same thing as me, as well as THOUSANDS of free doctors around the world, but they are ALL CENSORED and BANNED even Nobel prize winner in medecine like Luc Montagnier, and even the scientist who own the first many patents about mRNA technology, and even the Nobel prize winner who created the PVR technology ... Awake...Or stay with ignorant Neil Young...

I apologize to be rude here but....

i am flabbergasted by your way of judging what is "freedom"...

@mahgister You can’t have your cake and eat it too. You want to have the freedom to not be vaccinated, at the expense of people dying from car accidents, etc, that they didn’t have to. That is highly unethical.

@mahgister Lol. You are saying the same thing again. It doesn’t make it any more true. If you as an unvaccinated force the death of someone else when you take up resources that most likely you didn’t need to take up if you were vaccinated. 
 

This is how society works, and we have negligence laws, and why people can be criminally liable for their negligence. They choose not do the right thing, and therefore they are liable. Deal with your unethical behavior in some other forum, this is for audio discussions. 

@yuviarora There are five times more vaccinated people than unvaccinated - 85% of Canadians are vaccinated.

All other things being equal (they aren’t), were vaccinations of no effect at all, the expected number of cases who have been vaccinated would be 85% and 15% per 100,000 of population on a proportional basis.

So if in total there are 2,093 cases per 100,000, 85% is 1779, and 15% is 314.

This is not an exact science because there are many other factors which may make one group more or less susceptible to be caught than the other.

Hey, I'm not picking on you, I'm just clarifying what is often not well understood by many people including those people reporting and analyzing provided statistics - the concept known as pro rata, which can be googled, but roughly it means to take into consideration the relative proportions.

It is quite a useful concept to understand in general.