@allhifi Some think the reference 1 can be abit bright and harsh.
Its all a matter of preference. The reference are overpriced too.
Its all a matter of preference. The reference are overpriced too.
New Joseph Audio Pulsar Graphene 2
Hey "Bro"/prof: You are waay-cool. I'll check who it was (if it was email). " ...I'm sure it was Jeff Joseph who was being the jerk in that conversation. I'm never going to buy a pair of his speakers!" EXACTLY. Why would one ? Joey has more technical resources/ expertise than KEF (who reportedly spent millions-of-dollars toward the Blade/Reference R&D) ? Too funny. " .. I'm definitely going to heed your balanced, considered words of wisdom ..." No, not mine, but perhaps every single professional review on any of the current KEF Reference -and critical/expert listener's/owners themselves. pj |
allhifi, No, not mine, but perhaps every single professional review on any of the current KEF Reference -and critical/expert listener’s/owners themselves. ....^^^^ Says the guy who wrote this: allhifi: Kef Blades and/or LS50 are the shitty KEF’s Vs this:
https://www.stereophile.com/content/kef-blade-two-loudspeaker-measurements#gLZULFLJp20LuMl1.99 The Blades were universally raved, and the LS50 were so widely praised they became a hugely popular modern classic. Note also that reviews for the Joseph Pulsar speakers are universally RAVE reviews. But don’t let that little "consistency" problem bother you of ignoring opinions that don’t support your claims. You go right on telling us what’s-what in the hi-fi world. |
Post removed |
For anyone who doesn't have a Stereophile subscription and who was interested in JA's follow up review of the Perspective 2 Graphene, that follow up review is not online here: https://www.stereophile.com/content/joseph-audio-perspective-loudspeaker-perspective2-graphene JA now seems to recommend the Perspectives without any reservations. |