The original WAMM's looked better (4-piece system) and did sound really good - I heard them in a pretty good sized room. More recently
I got to hear the Alexandria-1 and thought IT was very good as well.
Over and above (perhaps) the XLF, I don't get the goal. Also, we're talking a VERY large listening space, properly built from scratch. Also, the bass sections would (IMHO) be better off separated off. they look so awkward stacking the drivers in this endless vertical array. Same old argument- why so much money? Who really needs a speaker like this?
I can name a dozen phenomenal speakers for a fraction of the cost, etc.
BUT... leave it to D. Wilson to astonish us crazies once again...
I got to hear the Alexandria-1 and thought IT was very good as well.
Over and above (perhaps) the XLF, I don't get the goal. Also, we're talking a VERY large listening space, properly built from scratch. Also, the bass sections would (IMHO) be better off separated off. they look so awkward stacking the drivers in this endless vertical array. Same old argument- why so much money? Who really needs a speaker like this?
I can name a dozen phenomenal speakers for a fraction of the cost, etc.
BUT... leave it to D. Wilson to astonish us crazies once again...