Tvad, I think you do potentially err in your presupposition.
You seem to insinuate that other mfgers upgrades are for reasons different than Nuforces.
Did it ever occur to you that perhaps Nuforce is just a bit more honest than other mfgers? Im not saying they are or are not. But did you ever stop to consider this?
For example, I am aware of a component mfger whose distributor performed a wholesale sell off of his entire inventory of the pricey component, thus rendering the product worthless in the marketplace.
To salvage the product and perhaps the company, it is my understanding the mfger announced a new and improved version of the product but there were supposedly no changes except cosmetic.
The product was salvaged. But the point being is that neither you, I nor anybody else really have any idea why any company truly announces a new revision.
Whether that story is true or not, well never know. But if it is true, there is just one deceptive reason for a mfgers revision.
That is why I think yours and others comments regarding this particular mfger are irresponsible, non-sensical, and potentially damaging.
Because you and others pretend you do know the real motivation for Nuforce performing a number of revisions. Shoot, for all we know maybe they dont even know why. And that is where I think you and others are potentially deceiving the reader into thinking you are in the know. When the fact of the matter is you and others are just as much in the dark as anybody else.
Perhaps its your speaking as fact and authoritative rather than guessing or hypothesizing that I find troubling.
-IMO
You seem to insinuate that other mfgers upgrades are for reasons different than Nuforces.
Did it ever occur to you that perhaps Nuforce is just a bit more honest than other mfgers? Im not saying they are or are not. But did you ever stop to consider this?
For example, I am aware of a component mfger whose distributor performed a wholesale sell off of his entire inventory of the pricey component, thus rendering the product worthless in the marketplace.
To salvage the product and perhaps the company, it is my understanding the mfger announced a new and improved version of the product but there were supposedly no changes except cosmetic.
The product was salvaged. But the point being is that neither you, I nor anybody else really have any idea why any company truly announces a new revision.
Whether that story is true or not, well never know. But if it is true, there is just one deceptive reason for a mfgers revision.
That is why I think yours and others comments regarding this particular mfger are irresponsible, non-sensical, and potentially damaging.
Because you and others pretend you do know the real motivation for Nuforce performing a number of revisions. Shoot, for all we know maybe they dont even know why. And that is where I think you and others are potentially deceiving the reader into thinking you are in the know. When the fact of the matter is you and others are just as much in the dark as anybody else.
Perhaps its your speaking as fact and authoritative rather than guessing or hypothesizing that I find troubling.
-IMO