On ''what there is''


The question looks ''philosophical'' in the sense of ''what exist?''. In the old terminology ''ontology question''.
The modern formulation (by Quine) is: ''what are the values of your variables''? In our hobby ''what are
the new available components''?  Can one person know what are available components? Obviously not
but we have ''collective knowledge''. Each contribution is welcome. Like in science. But like in science there
are individuals with special contributions. Raul with his MM contributions and his ''successor'' chakster
with his contributions about ''both kinds'': MC's and MM's. Despite his ''modest means''. I think we should
be thankful to have such individuals.
128x128nandric
The meaning of an word is its contribution to the meaning of an sentence or statement. This was Frege's opinion. Who would
believe that tzh21y could refute Frege?  He deed not need more
than one word. 
I think those guys tell us more about "what was" than about "what is".  This is also valuable information.
I think that you could have used less words nandric, but I think I understand your point.