Pangea AC-9SE vs AC-9

I have moved from AC-9 to AC-9SE for my power amp (W4S ST 500) and appreciate the upgrade.
I liked and still like the AC-9 very much, only the SE version improved things noticeably. Tightened the bass and improved clarity across the spectrum without any drawback that I can detect.

I dare say that everyone will notice the sonic difference, the contentious point remaining only whether the difference is "for the better in their case" and is worth the extra cash.

For me, the sonic difference was in the right direction and the price difference well worth it.
Those with bright(er) systems might say that the AC9 is better, for its relatively looser bass will give the impression of more bass.

YMMV, but this goes without saying...

Can anyone tell me how flexible the Pangea AC9 is? Looking at pictures of this 7awg cable, it looks very rigid. I don't want to bend it a lot but my amp is about 14" from the wall. My current power cord is like a wet noodle so I think this would be a huge upgrade.

It's not very flexible, but with enough length you can wrangle it into tight spaces. It may put stress on components.

Thanks Erndog. Maybe I can move the rack out a little to help ease the tension.

Don't get the 0.6m version of the AC-9.

I have this between my dedicated 20amp audio circuit and my Power Dist system - it is NOT flexible and puts alot of strain on the wall circuit to get the plug to line up with the receptacle.

Get the 1.0m or longer.