Passive/line stage HT preamp?

>> he Oppo has a volume control that works in the digital domain? Such controls theoretically lose resolution as the volume is reduced. <<

Except the Oppos use 32 bit internal processing for the volume control. Even if you turn the volume down significantly, you'll still have at least 24 bits of resolution. The Oppo's digital volume control is a very good one, I would not sweat this "issue"...

-RW-

I still think this comparison "shoot-out" NEEDS to be done at some point! I really do..
How many times over the years have we heard enthusiasts and audiophile’s alike discuss the topic of "bypassing an outboard AV pre-pro, and going multi analog ch source out directly into a power amp's inputs" -processing, strictly in the source component?
At the very least, there are many out there - purists? - who feel that the best possible sonic performance comes from doing a passive system, whether is be a stereo setup, or multi channel setup. And, regardless of the source - whether it be analog music or digital movie sources - this is the end-all of sonic achievement, period!
I for one think some A/B testing "shootout" NEEDS to be done here, in an effort to see/hear what's what?!
My experience with passive 2 channel music systems over the years, was that you trade dynamics and presence for tonal clarity and lack of coloration when you use a passive setup (no preamp in the chain). I've also personally found similar effect, using direct (passive) analog out from my past DVD players over the years -bypassing the outboard dedicated pre/pro - straight to multiple amplifier inputs, particularly for digital 5.1 channel processing...basically rather flat, dynamically, if super clear sounding.
So, what's the deal here!?! I still hear so many people stating that they don't think using a surround processor in they home theater system, is the best path to the best sound quality. Does anyone else out there find that the benefit of one less piece in the sonic chain to color the sound is outweighed greatly by the fact that the dynamics are severely lacking with a passive setup approach? - basically letting these OPPO'S handle everything redbook cd's to BluRay 7.1 HD tracks, internally?
Who'd care to chime in here with their experience? I mean are AV industry expert reviewers using pre's and AV receivers in their reference systems for the mere convenience of having source "switching", EQ's and volume control in the system, at the sake of absolute sonic purity? ..or are we missing something here?

"the Oppos use 32 bit internal processing for the volume control. Even if you turn the volume down significantly, you'll still have at least 24 bits of resolution. The Oppo's digital volume control is a very good one"

Good point; thank you for pointing that out.

The Oppo uses an ESS Sabre32 Reference DAC. For further insight into the issue, a slide presentation by ESS discusses the pros and cons of their digital versus analog volume controls:

http://www.esstech.com/PDF/digital-vs-analog-volume-control.pdf

My experience with the Oppo has been that the output levels at full range are pretty damn low. It's worth trying first, but for me there was just not enough volume by itself.

Also, it's single ended outputs only.  Aside from super-expensive amps which are balanced only, the ICEPower and Hypex modules all want a balanced input.  This is something the P7 will do for you rather nicely. Of course, you also get 2 channel to 7.1 channel switching, and 2 7.1 channel sources. 

Another alternative may be one of the miniDSP units for home theaters.  They include DSP, ADC, DAC and volume controls. Pretty spiffy and relatively cheap compared to the price of dedicated HT processors.