I understand, quite well.
Perhaps you don't understand my simple questions?
Perhaps you don't understand my simple questions?
Preamp passive output vs a ht feature - signal degradation
For integration with a ht system is it better to run cables thru a passive output on line stage preamp or find a preamp with a ht pass thru feature? Or does it matter?
I have noticed that the signal from ht processor seems degraded as it passes thru a passive output on a preamp. Lose alot of sound quality. Stereo sq is very good but now ht sound going to mains is impaired.
Is there better treatment (preservation) of a signal when going thru a ht bypass feature on preamp?
I have noticed that the signal from ht processor seems degraded as it passes thru a passive output on a preamp. Lose alot of sound quality. Stereo sq is very good but now ht sound going to mains is impaired.
Is there better treatment (preservation) of a signal when going thru a ht bypass feature on preamp?
5 responses Add your response
SQ compared to what? What is different in the SQ? Were you initially running the front speakers directly from the Marantz AVR? Is the McIntosh an integrated amp or a pre-amp? If it's a pre-amp, what's the amp and how do you know the amp is not "at fault"? Does the Marantz have a room correction application you need to re-run? "Love to know if passive output inside schiit preamp hurts quality of signal." is a totally loaded statement. Why Schiit, specifically? Why not some other pre-amp with passive output? Which Schiit? Who is to say, definitively, what constitutes "hurts"? Either YOU like the way it sounds or YOU don't. If you decide to use a Schiit pre-amp, make sure you know what you are doing. Search the forums as this has been beaten to death. In all likelyhood, Schiit is not for you. Best to search: <http://www.audiophile.no/en/articles-tests-reviews/item/426-amplifiers-with-processor-input> |