Oh. I thought "chrisvh" posted the truth above on 2/1/12
Also this post on AC which is located here:
http://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=54218.msg1047092#msg1047092
Have a closer look, Scotty. Here are some search results for the topic in question: http://goo.gl/9ZvYa. Simply click on the "cached" link, to view each page, which is a few days older. They just changed the descriptions, after this minor little translation oversight was uncovered.
Id made numerous e-mail requests to both Grant and Psvane (since September of 2011) to stop using the V-Cap trademark CuTF. Grant did acknowledge, and took down from their site (although forum posts still remain). Psvane didnt remove until a few days ago, around the time they posted their official "Mylar" response at Audiogon: http://goo.gl/fhJtX
Perhaps Psvane would have felt differently about trademark use if a competitor borrowed the term Treasure to market its own tube line and this competitor purported to use similar materials to Psvanes line of tubes. Cant help but wonder if Psvane would consider this an attempt to "copy", or at the very least an attempt to dilute their brand, as well as unfairly harvest search engine queries for Psvane's product trademark? As many know, there is little hope for trademark protection enforcement with Chinese companies- especially when you're a smaller operation, with little budget to go after large companies. Audiophiles, as a group, are a smart bunch they can come to their own conclusions on whats really happened here: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/vendors-bazaar/194521-psvane-teflon-film-copper-foil-caps-600v-rating-starting-99-pair.html
BTW- I had responded to the Audiogon thread Wednesday morning, but it would appear the moderators didnt feel appropriate to post. Update: Audiogon did finally post my response early this morning (2-3-2012).