Hi, Uncledemp,
Your question is not at all a bother and I am happy to try to help.
The first disclaimer, of course, is that there are so very many variables that determine the final outcome, including your own satisfaction or dissatisfaction. These include, but are not limited to: your associated equipment, the size and liveliness (or "deadness") of your listening room, the loudness level at which you typically listen, the kind of music you listen to the most, and on and on… That said, I have owned any number of "low-to-mid-level" (in terms of cost) speakers over the years, and this is what I have figured out.
As I said in my original review of the Reference 3A Dulcet, I need to have great imaging and some kind of satisfying low-end response in order to be happy. Other people may not care about these things as much, or may prioritize them differently, but this may give some context to my recommendations, preferences and experiences.
I have owned several floorstanding loudspeakers over the years. My very first was the original Vandersteen 2C that I purchased with my first "serious" stereo system in the mid-1980s. I liked it a lot, but it was a relatively big, unattractive speaker that needed substantial breathing room to sound good and wasn't going to work in my smaller listing quarters years later.
When I began to get back into high-end audio actively in the mid 2000's, I tried a series of "space-saving" floorstanding models. These included the Totem Arro, Ohm Micro Walsh Tall and Ohm 100, and Silverline Prelude (revised). All of these models have their devotees and great reviews, but for one reason or another I found them lacking.
What set me off in the direction of auditioning monitors (that is, stand mounted speakers) was the experience of borrowing a pair of PSB Synchrony One B’s for a weekend from our local, brick and mortar stereo store and finding that they worked much, much better in my room than any of the floorstanding speakers I had owned up to that point.
From that point onward, the following models marched in and out of my listening room (not in this exact order):
PSB Synchrony One B
LSA 1 Statement
Ascend Sierra One (the original, not the newer model with the improved tweeter)
Merlin TSM-mmi
LSA 1 Statement (again!)
Green Mountain Audio Rio
Again, if you’ve been researching monitor speakers then you know that a number of these are very well regarded in audiophile circles. I’d be glad to answer questions about my impressions of any of the above if you like.
Then, during the time period that I had the Merlin monitors, with which I had a love-frustration relationship for about 18 months, I saw an ad on Audiogon for a pair of used, Reference 3A Dulcet monitors. I called Reference 3A and spoke to the head of the company, Tash Goka, who told me that the pair I had seen was not up to the latest specifications and encouraged me to try a 30 day home edition with the latest model.
Within an hour or two of replacing the Merlin's with the Reference 3A's, I knew I had found something quite special. The Merlin's went up for sale. Six months later, I took advantage of a Reference 3A, direct purchase trade up option that allows you to get the full purchase price of any model to move up the line to something more expensive. So I bought the De Capo's and was thrilled.
Again, I'd be happy to comment further on any of the models listed above. I hasten to add that I'm not saying that any of the other speakers I tried are substandard – lots of people swear by several of them. But in terms of imaging, low-end response, coherence and musicality, the Reference 3A's really do it for me, and they get better and better with time and break in.
Your question is not at all a bother and I am happy to try to help.
The first disclaimer, of course, is that there are so very many variables that determine the final outcome, including your own satisfaction or dissatisfaction. These include, but are not limited to: your associated equipment, the size and liveliness (or "deadness") of your listening room, the loudness level at which you typically listen, the kind of music you listen to the most, and on and on… That said, I have owned any number of "low-to-mid-level" (in terms of cost) speakers over the years, and this is what I have figured out.
As I said in my original review of the Reference 3A Dulcet, I need to have great imaging and some kind of satisfying low-end response in order to be happy. Other people may not care about these things as much, or may prioritize them differently, but this may give some context to my recommendations, preferences and experiences.
I have owned several floorstanding loudspeakers over the years. My very first was the original Vandersteen 2C that I purchased with my first "serious" stereo system in the mid-1980s. I liked it a lot, but it was a relatively big, unattractive speaker that needed substantial breathing room to sound good and wasn't going to work in my smaller listing quarters years later.
When I began to get back into high-end audio actively in the mid 2000's, I tried a series of "space-saving" floorstanding models. These included the Totem Arro, Ohm Micro Walsh Tall and Ohm 100, and Silverline Prelude (revised). All of these models have their devotees and great reviews, but for one reason or another I found them lacking.
What set me off in the direction of auditioning monitors (that is, stand mounted speakers) was the experience of borrowing a pair of PSB Synchrony One B’s for a weekend from our local, brick and mortar stereo store and finding that they worked much, much better in my room than any of the floorstanding speakers I had owned up to that point.
From that point onward, the following models marched in and out of my listening room (not in this exact order):
PSB Synchrony One B
LSA 1 Statement
Ascend Sierra One (the original, not the newer model with the improved tweeter)
Merlin TSM-mmi
LSA 1 Statement (again!)
Green Mountain Audio Rio
Again, if you’ve been researching monitor speakers then you know that a number of these are very well regarded in audiophile circles. I’d be glad to answer questions about my impressions of any of the above if you like.
Then, during the time period that I had the Merlin monitors, with which I had a love-frustration relationship for about 18 months, I saw an ad on Audiogon for a pair of used, Reference 3A Dulcet monitors. I called Reference 3A and spoke to the head of the company, Tash Goka, who told me that the pair I had seen was not up to the latest specifications and encouraged me to try a 30 day home edition with the latest model.
Within an hour or two of replacing the Merlin's with the Reference 3A's, I knew I had found something quite special. The Merlin's went up for sale. Six months later, I took advantage of a Reference 3A, direct purchase trade up option that allows you to get the full purchase price of any model to move up the line to something more expensive. So I bought the De Capo's and was thrilled.
Again, I'd be happy to comment further on any of the models listed above. I hasten to add that I'm not saying that any of the other speakers I tried are substandard – lots of people swear by several of them. But in terms of imaging, low-end response, coherence and musicality, the Reference 3A's really do it for me, and they get better and better with time and break in.