2. tech-talk
  3. 1251350312

Resampling my music collection

Suppose I wanted to do a static resampling of my music collection in the form of lossless audio files. Would there be an advantage to resampling to 96 kHz rather than 48 kHz? The only quibble I have with 96 kHz is that it would make the files twice the size.

One of the reasons I want to do a static resample is that if I want to do any DSP during playback, I don't have to worry about the resampling ability of the DSP software that I use.
128x128dnewhous
jtwrace's avatar
jtwrace
443 posts
 
I use Mac for my computer audio so I'm all set there. At the $79 that Wave Editor costs, it MUCH less then Adobe Audition. Do you really think that A.A. would be better for me still?
onhwy61's avatar
onhwy61
5,229 posts
 
I don't see the point of your wanting to resample. How is resampling any different than any other DSP process you might apply?
jtwrace's avatar
jtwrace
443 posts
 
Many have reported great gains with up sample conversion rather then up sample conversion on the fly. I figure for the $79 for W.E. why not? Small price to pay and learn something in the process. No brainer IMO.

BTW-I wouldn't up sample my whole collection. Just the favorites.
dnewhous's avatar
dnewhous OP
68 posts
 
The problem is that you seam to think Wave Editor would be a good idea for me. If you aren't recommending that I buy the product, why are you even mentioning it?
dnewhous's avatar
dnewhous OP
68 posts
 
Onhwy61, this is not rocket science. Any other DSP process will do its own resampling if it encounters 44.1 kHz audio, and the quality of that resampling will be entirely unpredictable.
More to discover