Thanks for the review! I have the LS 25 MK1 and I am interested in an upgrade. This review helped!
Review: Audio Research LS-25 mkII Tube preamp
Category: Preamps
I compared the ARC LS-25 MKII to the BAT VK-30SE (which I own) at a dealer with the noted associated equipment. I was suprised to hear the difference in the preamps. The ARC was slightly more refined, better bass definition and a lot more dynamic that the BAT. The BAT seemed to limit and constrain dynamic swings especially soft to loud sounds of drums and a Hammond B3 organ. Again I heard it but would not have believed it unless I heard it in direct comparision. But there it was. I was never an ARC fan. I had compared the BAT to the older LS-22 a year or so ago and the BAT was smoother and more way more refined. The LS-22 had a poor high frequency sound as noted in the Stereophile review of this preamp many years ago.
So the ARC outpreformed the BAT in the areas stated above.
Associated gear
ARC CD-3, Plinius 102 (newest model) amp, B&W 802N speakers.
Similar products
BAT VK-30SE
I compared the ARC LS-25 MKII to the BAT VK-30SE (which I own) at a dealer with the noted associated equipment. I was suprised to hear the difference in the preamps. The ARC was slightly more refined, better bass definition and a lot more dynamic that the BAT. The BAT seemed to limit and constrain dynamic swings especially soft to loud sounds of drums and a Hammond B3 organ. Again I heard it but would not have believed it unless I heard it in direct comparision. But there it was. I was never an ARC fan. I had compared the BAT to the older LS-22 a year or so ago and the BAT was smoother and more way more refined. The LS-22 had a poor high frequency sound as noted in the Stereophile review of this preamp many years ago.
So the ARC outpreformed the BAT in the areas stated above.
Associated gear
ARC CD-3, Plinius 102 (newest model) amp, B&W 802N speakers.
Similar products
BAT VK-30SE
- ...
- 7 posts total
- 7 posts total