Roksan Caspian vs Musical Fidelity A3.2 CD


To anyone with experience with both, any comments on their characteristics please? Differences & similarities? Can one substitute another? Thanks.
lennychen
the roksan..in the time it takes to write this mf has changed models 6 times. seriously, the caspian has that certain quality that makes you forget the source and only hear the music...few players at any price do that..the a3.2 is a good performer but not a classic...check some other worthwhile brit players such as the sugden and the sonateer that are on a par with the caspian.jrd@
thanks...do you own a caspian and if so, what's your setup like? roksan doesn't seem to be a popular choice on audiogon. i've seen recommended setups from what hi-fi and hi-fi choice though...

anybody else have a contrary opinion?

thanks.
i do have a caspian in one of my systems..mated with a c22II mac pre, quad II jubilee monoblocks and castle harlechs....the caspian has gone head to head with several extremely expensive audiogon favorites that friends own and it always sounds better on a wider variety of music than they do..my own so called reference player from norway isn't nearly as lively or real sounding.