Hey Zephyr,
I just had to...... Thanks Zephyr for contributing Cybershaft's excellent OCXO at affordable prices!
Just received from Kenji an option 16, -116db/1 Hz OCXO hand selected/tested from many OCXO's.
The packaging was 1st class all the way, just beautifully well packaged and delivery was just too fast, i hadnt even expected it for another 2-3days.
I have to run it in, nut off the bat, coming from a Quartzlock rubidium 110db/1 Hz into a G-02, what i am experiencing exactly echos your comments from switch from rubidium to OCXO.
"
I had precision in many ways but not the beauty and naturalness I am experiencing with the lower phase-noise OCXO-based presentation."
The Rubidium has maybe better sparkle or "brightness", not in a really bad way and a bit more pyrotechnics in the bass... I would term it a hardness and some glare which i did not really find distracting with careful tweaks and room adjustments. Rubidium thus lends to a brighter, showy or flashy presentation.
Cybershaft's OCXO is just so much more grounded in the mid regions and has zero brightness that i can tell so far from any genre's of music now, even "poorer" commercial recordings.
Hi Custodian, i appreciate your comment now of low phase noise from your BVA 8607..."Zero digital glare" from discussion from another forum.
I am not certain is this an combined artifact of low phase noise and also character OCXO as opposed to a rubidium unit.
I guess i have fueled my quest of experiment with clocks. Thanks to all, a most excellent resource in this discussion.