Searching for the most "accurate" speaker (below 15K)


I’m looking for the most accurate and resolving speakers (budget is <= 15K). Paradigm Persona 3F, Kef Reference 3 or Focal Sopra 2 are some of the options I can think of. Any opinions on how these compare? Should I had other options to this shortlist? The amplifier is the (absolutely extraordinary) Nagra Classic AMP.

Thanks! :)
128x128vermeer
Depending on what you mean by large, you are wrong. Room modes are peaks (and nulls) at the resonance frequencies of the room. The smaller the room, the higher the frequency this occurs. Hence, using big speakers with a lot of low frequency output is asking for trouble.
There are five ways to deal with this:
1 use a bigger room
2 use bass traps (hard and ugly in a small room)
3 avoid low frequencies altogether, by using mini monitors (the only possiblility in really small rooms).
4 smoothen them by using multiple subwoofers
5 equalize them

In a small room the best way to proceed I think is a combination of the last three options. Multiple small subwoofers can give you enough extension for anything other than mega bang HT, and are a lot smoother than two main speakers. They can be located discreetly for best bass response and that is unlikely to be the best spot for midrange image. Avoid subs that go very deep.
Use room equalization like the Antimode 8033 to smoothen the response even further. Here, the use of multiple subs is particularly beneficial. The higher the frequency, the more localized the equalization will be. So if you start with a wider listening position by using multiple subs, you have a much better starting point for equalization. For the same reason, you do not want the main speakers to go very low.

There is one alternative to all this, and that is to use dipole speakers like the Quad electrostats (only the smaller 2815 in a room of this size). Dipole speakers excite far fewer room modes (which is why they sound so clean and neutral). However, they are pretty massive and need a bit of space behind them as well.
ATC. Some of the other speakers mentioned here, regardless of price, add their own coloration or character to the sound.
Dave

ATCs don't sound bright at all to my ear.  It's just that many pop and rock records (a fair bit of what I listen to) are splashy (at best) and ragged/awful through the presence (not uncommon) to totally screwed up overall (sometimes).  I prefer something with a gently falling treble response, which isn't ATC

To be clear, I prefer a specific type of inaccurate speaker, which isn't to suggest that anyone else should.
Marty is correct. My experience with ATC is they are quite flat but have rolled off treble above 12K. So actually their soft dome tweeters are polite compared to other metal dome tweeters that extend higher.

The main thing with ATC is that the mid range has no dip or scoop. This means distortion and compression in modern pop rock can sound harsh on an ATC compared to the usual scooped midrange of the vast majority of speakers (B&W is prototypical). This translates to a more forward sound (close to the stage) than most smiley EQ speakers with a scoop.

Perhaps this is what Dave means by bright. I think Dave has the ATC 40 which is mid range in ATC domestic range. The larger ATCs actually have even more massive drivers - the 3 inch mid range “super” model is heavy (20 lbs).