Should people who can't solder, build or test their speakers be considered audiophiles?



  So, if you bought that Porsche but can only drive it and not fix it do you really understand and appreciate what it is? I say no. The guy who can get in there and make it better, faster or prettier with his own hands has a superior ability to understand the final result and can appreciate what he has from a knowledge base and not just a look at what I bought base. I mean sure you can appreciate that car when you drive it but if all you do is take it back to the dealership for maintenance and repairs you just like the shape with no real understanding of what makes it the mechanical marvel it is.
  I find that is true with the audio world too. There are those who spend a ton of money on things and then spend a lot of time seeking peer approval and assurance their purchase was the right one and that people are suitably impressed. Of course those who are most impressed are those who also do not design, build, test or experiment.

  I propose that an audiophile must have more than a superficial knowledge about what he listens to and must technically understand what he is listening to. He knows why things work and what his end goal is and often makes his own components to achieve this. He knows how to use design software to make speakers that you can't buy and analyze the room they are in and set up the amplification with digital crossovers and DSP. He can take a plain jane system and tweak it and balance it to best suit the room it is in. He can make it sound far better than the guy who constantly buys new components based on his superficial knowledge who does not understand why what he keeps buying in vain never quite gets there.

  A true audiophile can define his goal and with hands on ability achieve what a mere buyer of shiny parts never will. So out comes the Diana Krall music and the buyer says see how good my system is? The audiophile says I have taken a great voice and played it through a system where all was matched and tweaked or even purposely built and sits right down next to Diana as she sings. The buyer wants prestigious signature sound and the audiophile will work to achieve an end result that is faithful true to life audio as though you were in the room with Diana as she sings. The true audiophile wants true to life and not tonally pure according to someones artificial standard.

 So are you a buyer or an audiophile and what do you think should make a person an audiophile?
mahlman
Oh gosh...there's a certification process now?  Will there be annual dues that are owed?
It’s so great when one pseudo skeptic high fives 👋👋 another pseudo skeptic. In this case robberrttddidd and mahlware OP. They go together like peas and carrots. No offense intended.
Beaver felt in the woofer cones... Rudy taught me that...

don’t get confused....
Give me a break. Just another in a long line of troll posts by the OP, to whit from 2 years ago,

mahlman OP

“What is trully important?

So I read about all these expensive bits of gear here and I have some thoughts. In the world of large money bands and their touring where individual seats can cost well north of 5G is there any sort of restriction on equipment they can buy? I don’t think so and they want fidelity. What do recording studios use for session recordings? Is the idea of true to life important and what do you use to get there? Does real life reproduction matter or is some sort of electronic pure tonal thing the most important even though you will never hear that in live venues.
I am fascinated by the amount of money spent that the pros never spend to get results and the pros are a purely result driven group.“

>>>>>>There is also this jewel, cut me some slack, Jack!

https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/so-what-is-real
Like a lot of boomers, I got into this hobby building Dynakits, Heathkits, even an HK Citation 12 kit (1971?), b/c of poverty, a love of music, a fascination with the technology that could re-create a musical experience in my dorm room!  I have always been a "hobbyist" more than a big A Audiophile b/c in my value system, high bucks gear just never fit...I never made that kind of dough.  Being in the business, I leveraged accomodation pricing, points-for-product, and buying good used gear so I've had some pretty fantastic systems, but nothing truly "high end" as now understood.  I definitely count myself a small a audiophile, though, and I suppose It enhances my self esteem at some level to look down on those with large incomes (and no soldering skills) who buy their way in...but they're also the ones by whom I support myself!  So go figure!