"No true Scotsman, or appeal to purity, is an informal fallacy in which one attempts to protect a universal generalization from counterexamples by changing the definition in an ad hoc fashion to exclude the counterexample."
Quite sagacious, erudite and pithy I must say. Once you get done digging in wiki for all that highfalutin jargon of yours check out what started it all. The pretentious nonsense offered in all seriousness by some here is mind boggling and worthy of satire. One of the things most entertaining with this thread has been the serious studious responses to what I said but the dismissal of the basis for which I said it. It's kind of like ignoring what you can see if you look so you can hurry up and and sound all serious highbrow audiophile like. Thanks for your contribution!
https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/should-people-with-no-turntable-or-reel-to-reel-be-considered...
Quite sagacious, erudite and pithy I must say. Once you get done digging in wiki for all that highfalutin jargon of yours check out what started it all. The pretentious nonsense offered in all seriousness by some here is mind boggling and worthy of satire. One of the things most entertaining with this thread has been the serious studious responses to what I said but the dismissal of the basis for which I said it. It's kind of like ignoring what you can see if you look so you can hurry up and and sound all serious highbrow audiophile like. Thanks for your contribution!
https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/should-people-with-no-turntable-or-reel-to-reel-be-considered...