sound difference MIT ORACLE AC1 vs ELROD vs PURIST

thanks,
I will try to use it as input of my Quantum distributor and then switch to Berkeley.
I will test it to replace the quantum cable which I found very attractive in term of lower bass extension.
It is incredible how the power cables can modify and improve the sonic performance of components, expecially with Kharma which is very sensible to any change.
Which main difference (in term of sonic features) between old and new series of Elrod cables?

I went with the EPS-2 Signature because of finances. The newer the better from all the reveiws I've read. Go with what you can afford. If I could afford it I would step up to the Statement series.

I cannot comment on specifics of the EPS2 versus current Statement series as I never owned the EPS2 cables. You may want to do a search on EPS and Statement on the discussion forums and on Virtual Systems and contact people who have owned one or both. The info I pulled back from doing this seemed to me to indicate that the Statement series give increased amounts of energy, refinement, huge sound stage and musicality to the system.

I have 2 Statement Golds. One to the PS Audio Quintet and one to the dCS dac. Simply love them! Compared to the MIT Oracle AC-2 and AC-2, the MIT sounded thick and slow. The fact that the Elrod cables are not taken seriously in the audio press is proof to me that you can buy attention and that the pursuit of the best by reviewers is restricted to the field of friends and dollars (advertisement money).

finally I received the EPS-2 Signature.
This cable seams to be magic. I compared it to the Magnum AC and Elrod seems to give more depth and more body to the sound. The cable is connected to the Quantum QB8 Distribution. Kharma speakers seem, even more, disappear from the scene. Bass are much present and with greater impact. I reinserted the pre Spectral DMC15, in the chain, even though many people claim that the BADA go directly coupled to the Final. The result is magnificent.