Soundsmith having Issues because of COVID


Don't know if there's any way to help but he posted this on AudioAsylum:

 I WISH I have the luxury of time, but with this virus and its effect on my many employees and my business surviving this, I unfortunately do not. I look forward as I have done for 50 years to help all my customers, no matter what level of cartridge they have bought - many times not even my designs. But time right now is the final frontier for me and my company. Sales are at ZERO and overhead/payroll continues as everyone is sheltered at home. We are in the epicenter. I sent everyone home 8 weeks ago.  

dhcod
In case you by chance look at this again Peter, it sounds to me like the Soundsmith fan club. Except for one person. Just ignore him, he’s an odd one. I’m in a similar position with my business, except completely closed and 0 revenue. I understand how you feel. I wish though that I had the fans and support that I hear here that you do. With the reputation of your company, Soundsmith will be one of the survivors.
Millercarbon, go to Whats Best Forum
Vinyl threads
Catridges
Thread is "Next Steps Soundsmith Fixed Coil Cartridges"
Big comparison set up my member Shakti
Me as Spirit Of Music also contributes 
@millercarbon   If you do go over to 'Whats Best Forum', make sure you don't bring up anything that might upset one of the all knowing, all seeing gurus over there! They are very one sided and there is no moderation.
glubson,''nice story but how is it related to Soundsmth story?''
My first post dispute the ''believing''  part of the story.
Believing in Peter's  capability, integrity, ect. is not the same as
believing  in Soundsmith as company. There was an  French
king who stated: ''France that is I''. Besides Peter is not some
''collective being'' . He is as all of us an individual person not
by chance with his own name. Because he himself . stated to
have .''many employees'' there is, say chance, that someone
else retiped the cart. So ''Peter retiped my cart'' will not do.
The reason is simple: it is not true that Peter retiped my cart.
So if someone else deed it then one should use the quantifier
''some'' which is most easy to explain with: ''someone has stolen
my cart''. This is the same as I have no idea who retiped
my cart. Strange ''base'' for believiving. All the 'straw man'' 
constructions against me were actually based on assumption
that my intention was to hurt Peter. I used the other example, 
Van den Hul with the same problem. When people state
 ''Van den Hul retiped my cart'' what are they referring to? 
Van den Hul himself or his company? Companies are theso called 
''legal bodies'' . Invented by lawyers in order to reduce risk for the 
entrepreneurs.
By separating comapies assets from his private assets. Such that
only company assets would be liable for their debts, But company
is not able to act. Only humans can act. So each legal body has
representatives who act in the name of the company. 
My point was that believes have nothing to do with the truth.
An statement is true or false irrespective  from what we believe.